Cited by 36

Parental Opinions Regarding Treatment for Social Anxiety Disorder in Youth

CHAVIRA, DENISE A., STEIN, MURRAY B., BAILEY, KELLY, STEIN, MARTIN T.·2003·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

This study surveyed parents' opinions about treatment for childhood social anxiety disorder and assessed variables that may affect treatment acceptability. A 20-item survey assessing treatment attitudes and a semistructured interview were administered to 190 parents of children (8-17 years) who were randomly selected from a pediatric primary care setting. An exploratory factor analysis of the treatment attitudes survey yielded four factors: medication acceptability, counseling acceptability, counseling feasibility, and general beliefs about social anxiety treatment. Findings revealed that parents endorsed favorable attitudes toward counseling and somewhat neutral beliefs about medication. White parents were more accepting of medication and counseling and also perceived counseling as more feasible than nonwhite parents. Treatment acceptance was associated with past mental health utilization but not with severity of social anxiety. Further research is necessary to determine if clinical interventions for child anxiety disorders may be more efficacious if parents' attitudes and beliefs about prescribed treatments are addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004703-200310000-00002

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHAVIRA, D. A., STEIN, M. B., BAILEY, K., & STEIN, M. T.
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2003-10
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
315-322
ISSN
0196-206X
Cited by
36
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review