Cited by 352Treatment of Major DepressionOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid Use

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Buprenorphine Treatment of Refractory Depression

Bodkin, J. Alexander, Zornberg, Gwen L., Lukas, Scott E., Cole, Jonathan O.·1995·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Opiates were used to treat major depression until the mid-1950s. The advent of opioids with mixed agonist-antagonist or partial agonist activity, with reduced dependence and abuse liabilities, has made possible the reevaluation of opioids for this indication. This is of potential importance for the population of depressed patients who are unresponsive to or intolerant of conventional antidepressant agents. Ten subjects with treatment-refractory, unipolar, nonpsychotic, major depression were treated with the opioid partial agonist buprenorphine in an open-label study. Three subjects were unable to tolerate more than two doses because of side effects including malaise, nausea, and dysphoria. The remaining seven completed 4 to 6 weeks of treatment and as a group showed clinically striking improvement in both subjective and objective measures of depression. Much of this improvement was observed by the end of 1 week of treatment and persisted throughout the trial. Four subjects achieved complete remission of symptoms by the end of the trial (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores < or = 6), two were moderately improved, and one deteriorated. These findings suggest a possible role for buprenorphine in treating refractory depression.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004714-199502000-00008

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Carlson, 1963, Am J Psychiatry, 112-, 7
  2. Lehmann, 1971, Curr Ther Res, 13, 42
  3. Exstein, 1981, Psychopharmacol Bull, 17, 29
  4. Resnick, 1992, Psychopharmacol Bull, 28, 109
  5. Banks, 1979, N Z Med J, 89, 255
  6. Thase, 1992, J Clin Psychiatry, 53, 5
  7. Bickel, 1988, J Psychopharmacol Exp Ther, 247, 47
  8. Harrison, 1988, Psychopharmacol Bull, 24, 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–352 of 352

Metadata

Authors
Bodkin, J. A., Zornberg, G. L., Lukas, S. E., & Cole, J. O.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
1995-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
49-57
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063621859
Cited by
346
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-00115)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
buprenorphine, treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, antidepressant treatment, opioid side effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Buprenorphine, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review