Cited by 163Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and recognition of depressive syndromes in German primary care settings: poorly recognized and treated?

Wittchen, H.-U., H??fler, M., Meister, W.·2001·International Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

The study examines the prevalence of depressive syndromes among unselected primary care attenders, as well as doctors' recognition and treatment rates, in order to examine patient and doctor-related factors associated with poor recognition. This nationwide study included a total of 20421 patients (aged 15-99 years) attending their primary care doctors (n = 633) on the study's target day in April 1999. Patients received a self-report questionnaire, including the Depression Screening Questionnaire (DSQ), to provide diagnoses of depressive disorders according to the criteria of DSM-IV and ICD-10. Doctors completed: (1) a pre-study questionnaire assessing data on doctors' psychosocial, professional and training background, as well as current practices in patients with depression and (2) an evaluation form for each patient seen to assess his diagnostic decision, clinical severity and treatment choices. Taking the DSQ as a yardstick, 4.2% of all primary care attenders fulfilled criteria for a major depressive episode according to DSM-IV; considerably higher rates of 11.3% were obtained using the ICD-10 criteria for mild depressive episodes. Rates of depression were higher in females, increased by age, and were also elevated in those retired, unemployed as well as non-working housemen/wives. Taking the doctors' decision of definite or probable depression, 75% of all DSM and 59% of all ICD-10 diagnoses were recognized by the treating physician. However, doctors also assigned diagnose…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004850-200105000-00001

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hirschfeld, 1997, JAMA, 277, 333, 10.1001/jama.1997.03540280071036 · DOI
  2. Tylee, 1993, Br J Gen Pract, 43, 327
  3. Wittchen, 1999, Nervenheilkunde, 18, 210
  4. Zung, 1983, J Clin Psychiatry, 44, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wittchen, H.-U., H??fler, M., & Meister, W.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE)
Venue
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2001-05
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
121-135
ISSN
0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005528619
Cited by
163
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depressive disorders, depression prevalence, primary care, depression detection, underdiagnosis, antidepressant treatment, DSM-IV, ICD-10, major depressive episode, psychomotor retardation, psychiatric referral, physician characteristics, Germany, gender differences, psychosocial factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Drug Utilization, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Primary Health Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review