Arginine vasopressin response to hypertonicity in hypertension studied by arginine vasopressin assay in unextracted plasma
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether plasma osmolality (Posm)-plasma arginine vasopressin (PAVP) response relationships with particular characteristics of sensitivity, gain or response pattern (linear/non-linear) occur more frequently in hypertensive than normotensive subjects. DESIGN: Analysis of Posm-PAVP curves observed in individual normotensive and hypertensive subjects rather than whole groups was considered appropriate for the described objective. METHODS: A sensitive and precise radioimmunoassay of PAVP in unextracted plasma was developed. Posm was raised in 11 normotensive and 19 hypertensive subjects by infusion of NaCl solution (0.86 mol/l, i.v.), and PAVP assayed at intervals. Best-fitting linear and non-linear equations for the Posm-PAVP relationship were established by computer. RESULTS: The mean rise in osmolality, blood pressure and blood volume was similar in the two groups. Hypertensive subjects showed a tendency towards higher rates of response (pmol AVP/l per mosm per kg) at Posm greater than 290 mosm/kg, leading to a non-linear response pattern compared with the normotensive subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced PAVP responses found in the hypertensive subjects at Posm greater than 290 mosm/kg may reinforce vascular and central nervous pathogenetic mechanisms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Levels from an individual could be verified by constructing a standard curve in hormone-stripped plasma from that individual, although it would be impractical to do this for every individual sampled.
“Levels from an individual could be verified by constructing a standard curve in hormone‐stripped plasma from that individual 93, although it would be impractical to do this for every individual sampled.”
From Measuring Oxytocin and Vasopressin: Bioassays, Immunoassays and Random Numbers (2016) · cites this paper as [93]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measuring Oxytocin and Vasopressin: Bioassays, Immunoassays and Random Numbers
Leng, G., & Sabatier, N. (2016) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/jne.12413 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Bo, A. D., Suraci, S., Giuditta, M., Mistò, M., & Zanchetti, A. (1997) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/00004872-199715110-00012 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Moses, A. M., & Jones, C. (1996) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012688460-9/50019-3
- Authors
- Henneberry, H. P., Slater, J. D. H., Eisen, V., & F??hr, S.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- ORCID
- Slater, Jeremy D H
- Venue
- Journal of Hypertension
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 221-228
- ISSN
- 0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019158513
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
- Keywords
- vasopressin, plasma osmolality, hypertonicity, hypertension, osmoregulation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Arginine Vasopressin, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Hypertonic Solutions, Male, Middle Aged, Osmolar Concentration, Plasma Volume, Radioimmunoassay, Time Factors, Least-Squares Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review