Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reproducibility and clinical value of nocturnal hypotension: prospective evidence from the SAMPLE study

Open access
Omboni, Stefano, Parati, Gianfranco, Palatini, Paolo, Vanasia, Alessandro, Muiesan, Maria Lorenza, Cuspidi, Cesare, Mancia, Giuseppe·1998·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether modifications in the nighttime blood pressure fall caused by antihypertensive treatment predict the regression of end-organ damage of hypertension. METHODS: The analysis was performed in patients with essential hypertension and echocardiographically detected left ventricular hypertrophy involved in the SAMPLE study. For each patient, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass index were performed at the end of a 4-week wash-out pretreatment period, after 3 and 12 months of treatment with lisinopril or with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide and after a final 4-week placebo period. For each ambulatory blood pressure monitoring the 24 h average, daytime average (0600-2400 h), night-time average (2400-0600 h) and day-night difference was computed. The percentages of dipper and non-dipper patients (i.e. the patients with night blood pressure falls greater and less than 10% of the daytime average, respectively) were also computed. RESULTS: The reproducibility of the day-night difference was low, both for comparison of the pretreatment and final placebo periods (n = 170) and for comparison of the third and the 12th month of treatment (n = 180). The reproducibility of the dipper-non-dipper dichotomy was also low, 35-40% of patients becoming non-dippers if they were dippers and vice versa, both with and without treatment The changes in left ventricular mass index after 12 months of treatment were significantly (P<0.01) related to the changes in 24 h, daytime and night-time blood pressure (r always > 0.33), but this was not the case for the treatment-induced modification of the day-night difference (r= -0.03 and -0.008 for systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that day-night blood pressure changes and the classification of patients into dippers and non-dippers are poorly reproducible over time. It also provides the first prospective evidence that treatment-induced changes in day-night blood pressure difference are not related to treatment-induced regression of left ventricular mass index, thus having a limited clinical significance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004872-199816060-00003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
Omboni, S., Parati, G., Palatini, P., Vanasia, A., Muiesan, M. L., Cuspidi, C., & Mancia, G.
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
1998-06
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
733-738
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2313803809
Cited by
251
References
1
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducibility and clinical value of nocturnal hypotension: prospective evidence from the SAMPLE study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004872-199816060-00003
The paper
Omboni, S., Parati, G., Palatini, P., Vanasia, A., Muiesan, M. L., Cuspidi, C., & Mancia, G. (1998). Reproducibility and clinical value of nocturnal hypotension: prospective evidence from the SAMPLE study. Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199816060-00003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.