Cited by 29Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Comparison of wrist blood pressure measurement with conventional sphygmomanometry at a cardiology outpatient clinic

Zweiker, Robert, Schumacher, Martin, Fruhwald, Friedrich M., Watzinger, Norbert, Klein, Werner·2000·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Oscillometric measurement of blood pressure at the wrist is becoming a widely used method for detection of hypertension and its control by treatment. The objective of the present study was to evaluate accuracy and suitability of wrist measurement in a clinical routine setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 333 consecutive patients admitted to our cardiology outpatient clinic were included. Blood pressure was measured at both upper arms according to World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension guidelines. Oscillometric measurement was performed at the contralateral wrist simultaneously. Blood pressure readings were taken by an oscillometric device applied at the wrist ('Klock'; Industrielle Entwicklung Medizintechnik, Stolberg, Germany) and a conventional mercury sphygmomanometer applied at the upper arm. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were excluded due to differences in blood pressure > 5 mmHg between both upper arms or due to 'error' messages of the wrist device. The data of the remaining 255 patients (149 males; mean age, 65 +/- 13 years; range, 18-95 years) are presented. Mean conventional blood pressure was significantly lower compared with the wrist device (137 +/- 20/80 +/- 11 mmHg versus 153 +/- 28/87 +/- 18 mmHg; P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). The mean difference was 16 +/- 25/6 +/- 17 mmHg. In clinical terms, differences in blood pressure exceeding +/-20/+/-10 mmHg reflecting classification of hypertension are considered important. Measurements of 101 (40%) patients were within these limits. Systolic readings of 110 (43%) and diastolic readings of 117 patients (46%) were beyond this scope. CONCLUSION: Due to low reliability of wrist blood pressure measurement, it cannot compete with the upper arm standard procedure. If ever, it should only be used if test readings in an individual comparing wrist and upper arm measurement show differences within a range of +/-20/+/-10 mmHg.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004872-200018080-00004

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zweiker, R., Schumacher, M., Fruhwald, F. M., Watzinger, N., & Klein, W.
Affiliations
University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Zweiker, Robert
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2000-08
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
1013-1018
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001639725
Cited by
29
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
oscillometric blood pressure, hypertension diagnosis, measurement agreement, hypertension classification, cardiology outpatient clinic
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Outpatient Clinics, Hospital, Wrist, Cardiology Service, Hospital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review