The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography in stratifying risk in patients with essential hypertension: the Assessment of Prognostic Risk Observational Survey
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography, by providing a more accurate assessment of cardiac and vascular damage related to hypertension, may lead to a more precise stratification of the global cardiovascular risk. However, current guidelines do not recommend systematic use of ultrasound examination of heart and large arteries in evaluating the cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography on global risk stratification in hypertensive patients classified as being at low or medium risk according to routine clinical work-up as suggested by current hypertension guidelines. METHODS: Among 8502 consecutive patients screened at 44 outpatient hypertension hospital clinics in different parts of Italy, 1074 untreated individuals with low-to-medium risk essential hypertension were identified on the basis of the diagnostic routine procedures suggested by 1999 World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension guidelines: medical history, physical examination and clinic blood pressure measurement; routine blood chemistry and urine analysis; electrocardiogram. The extent of risk for the 1074 individuals was reassessed by adding the results of ultrasound examinations of heart and carotid arteries: left ventricular hypertrophy (defined as left ventricular mass index > 120 g/m(2) in men and > 100 g/m(2) in women), carotid intima-media thickening (defined as diffuse thickening if >or= 0.8 mm), and presence of plaque (defined as focal thickening > 1.3 mm). RESULTS: According to routine classification, 18.7% (n = 201) of the 1074 patients were considered at low risk and 81.3% (n = 873) at medium risk. A marked change in risk stratification was obtained when ultrasound markers of target-organ damage were taken into consideration: the proportion of low-risk patients decreased to 11.1%, and that of medium risk patients to 35.7%, whereas more than 50% of the patients previously classified at low-medium risk were found to be at high absolute risk. According to a multivariate analysis, age, grade of hypertension, male sex, and serum cholesterol concentration were the variables with the greatest impact on risk class change. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound assessment of the heart and carotid wall helps to obtain a more valid assessment of global cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients without evidence of target-organ damage after routine examination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levy, D., Garrison, R. J., Savage, D. D., Kannel, W. B., & Castelli, W. P. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199005313222203 · Cited by 5,699
O'Leary, D. H., Polak, J. F., Kronmal, R. A., Manolio, T. A., Burke, G. L., & Wolfson, S. K. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901073400103 · Cited by 4,685
Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging.
Pignoli, P., Tremoli, E., Poli, A., Oreste, P., & Paoletti, R. (1986) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.74.6.1399 · Cited by 2,404
Devereux, R. B., & Alderman, M. H. (1993) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.88.4.1444 · Cited by 298
Cited by
(2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151 · Cited by 13,655
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
Williams, B., Mancia, G., Spiering, W., Agabiti Rosei, E., Azizi, M., Burnier, M., Clement, D. L., Coca, A., de Simone, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2018) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339 · Cited by 10,286
Self-citationMancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Self-citationWilliams, B., Mancia, G., Spiering, W., Agabiti Rosei, E., Azizi, M., Burnier, M., Clement, D. L., Coca, A., de Simone, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000001940 · Cited by 2,885
Self-citationAuthors/Task Force Members:, Mancia, G., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., Cifkova, R., Fagard, R., Germano, G., Grassi, G., Heagerty, A. M., Kjeldsen, S. E., et al. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm236 · Cited by 2,384
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cuspidi, C., Ambrosioni, E., Mancia, G., Pessina, A. C., Trimarco, B., & Zanchetti, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Hypertension
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1307-1314
- ISSN
- 0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2332140992
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography in stratifying risk in patients with essential hypertension: the Assessment of Prognostic Risk Observational Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004872-200207000-00017
- The paper
- Cuspidi, C., Ambrosioni, E., Mancia, G., Pessina, A. C., Trimarco, B., & Zanchetti, A. (2002). Role of echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography in stratifying risk in patients with essential hypertension: the Assessment of Prognostic Risk Observational Survey. Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-200207000-00017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.