Cited by 755Psychology of Social InfluencePsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPain Management and Placebo Effect

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Persuasion and Healing: A Comparative Study of Psychotherapy

Kubie, Lawrence S., Frank, Jerome D.·1961·The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005053-196112000-00018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 755

Metadata

Authors
Kubie, L. S., & Frank, J. D.
Venue
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Published
1961-12
Volume
133
Issue
6
Pages
561-566
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4248461046
Cited by
755
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
101.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
persuasion, healing, therapeutic influence, therapeutic relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review