The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Pet as an Anxiolytic Intervention
Abstract
The effect of a pet on psychological consequences of stress (i.e., state and trait anxiety levels) of college students was examined under three test conditions (i.e., reading aloud, reading quietly, and interacting with a friendly but unknown dog). A repeated-measures analysis of variance with three covariates was used to examine the effect of the treatment on each dependent variable (state and trait anxiety). Reading aloud differed from baseline measure under all treatment conditions (p less than .001). Reading quietly and interacting with the dog were slightly below baseline for variables, with more effect seen by reading quietly than by interacting with the dog. Examination of interactions among variables showed no significant differences. Effects upon state anxiety were significant, while trait anxiety levels remained fairly constant throughout the treatments. Baseline differences in trait anxiety scores indicate a potentially greater benefit for pet owners than nonowners. Selected social network and relationship data related to the role of the pet during anxiety-producing times were also analyzed. While interaction with the pet produced a decrease in anxiety level, pet owners did not report the use of their own pet as a social support (i.e., as confidant) significantly more than did previous owners. Results indicated that interacting with a pet for some individuals does affect both physiological and psychological responses by lowering response levels. However, a parallel effect was also seen by reading quietly. Given the effect of pet interaction upon selected social support indicators of health in well college students, these data suggest the importance of examining this treatment with an "at-risk" group in which it is possible to control for ownership characteristics.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“those who own a pet have been shown to display reduction in blood pressure and cholesterol levels, require less medical care, and it has also been reported that there is an improvement of life quality and quick recovery after heartbreaking events [209-213]”
From Pet roundworms and hookworms: A continuing need for global worming (2012) · cites this paper as [210]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Drozdzowska, B., Pluskiewicz, W., Halaba, Z. P., Misiołek, H., & Beck, B. R. (2005) · Cited by 984
Beetz, A., Uvnäs-Moberg, K., Julius, H., & Kotrschal, K. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234 · Cited by 904
Friedmann, E., & Thomas, S. A. (1995) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80343-9 · Cited by 489
Animal-assisted therapy — magic or medicine?
Odendaal, J. S. J. (2000) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00183-5 · Cited by 444
“Other symptomatic indications of physiological effects were anxiety and stress relief, or in physiological terms, the effects of the autonomic nervous system [6].”
BackgroundHuman behaviour and the epidemiology of parasitic zoonoses
Macpherson, C. N. L. (2005) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.06.004 · Cited by 431
“Profound psychological and physiological responses have been recorded in pet owners, including a reduction in blood pressure (Wilson, 1991), reduced numbers of visits to physicians and reduced medication (Heady and Krause, 1999), improved 1-year survival after an acute myocardial infarction (Friedmann and Thomas, 1995…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- WILSON, C. C.
- Affiliations
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
- Corresponding author
- WILSON, CINDY C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 482-489
- ISSN
- 0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053259654
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- animal-assisted interventions, dogs, state anxiety, trait anxiety, stress, university students, reading aloud, social support, pet ownership, social networks
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Anxiety, Human-Animal Bond, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Personality, Personality Inventory, Reading, Social Support, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review