Cited by 179Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Pet as an Anxiolytic Intervention

WILSON, CINDY C.·1991·The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Abstract

The effect of a pet on psychological consequences of stress (i.e., state and trait anxiety levels) of college students was examined under three test conditions (i.e., reading aloud, reading quietly, and interacting with a friendly but unknown dog). A repeated-measures analysis of variance with three covariates was used to examine the effect of the treatment on each dependent variable (state and trait anxiety). Reading aloud differed from baseline measure under all treatment conditions (p less than .001). Reading quietly and interacting with the dog were slightly below baseline for variables, with more effect seen by reading quietly than by interacting with the dog. Examination of interactions among variables showed no significant differences. Effects upon state anxiety were significant, while trait anxiety levels remained fairly constant throughout the treatments. Baseline differences in trait anxiety scores indicate a potentially greater benefit for pet owners than nonowners. Selected social network and relationship data related to the role of the pet during anxiety-producing times were also analyzed. While interaction with the pet produced a decrease in anxiety level, pet owners did not report the use of their own pet as a social support (i.e., as confidant) significantly more than did previous owners. Results indicated that interacting with a pet for some individuals does affect both physiological and psychological responses by lowering response levels. However, a parallel effect was also seen by reading quietly. Given the effect of pet interaction upon selected social support indicators of health in well college students, these data suggest the importance of examining this treatment with an "at-risk" group in which it is possible to control for ownership characteristics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005053-199108000-00006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
WILSON, C. C.
Affiliations
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
WILSON, CINDY C.
Venue
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Published
1991-08
Volume
179
Issue
8
Pages
482-489
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053259654
Cited by
177
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
animal-assisted interventions, dogs, state anxiety, trait anxiety, stress, university students, reading aloud, social support, pet ownership, social networks
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Anxiety, Human-Animal Bond, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Personality, Personality Inventory, Reading, Social Support, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review