Cited by 116Human-Animal Interaction StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Association with Companion Animals and the Expression of Noncognitive Symptoms in Alzheimerʼs Patients

FRITZ, CURTIS L., FARVER, THOMAS B., KASS, PHILIP H., HART, LYNETTE A.·1995·The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Abstract

Interactions with companion animals have been shown to have socializing and calming effects for Alzheimer's patients in an institutional setting. Sixty-four Alzheimer's patients living in the private home were studied, through medical records and information provided by caregivers, to determine what effect association with a companion animal had on the progression of cognitive decline and the manifestation of concomitant noncognitive symptoms. Prevalence of episodes of verbal aggression and anxiety was reported less frequently in 34 patients who were exposed to companion animals compared with patients who were not exposed. Significantly fewer mood disorders were reported in patients who were attached to their pets compared with patients who were not attached. There was no significant difference in the rate of cognitive decline between pet-exposed and nonexposed patients as measured by three standard indices. This study lends preliminary support to the belief that interaction with pets can aid in tempering feelings of agitation and aggression in Alzheimer's patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005053-199507000-00006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In one comparison survey, demented pet owners were less likely to exhibit verbal aggression but were otherwise similar to non-pet owners in likelihood of vegetative, hyperactive, or psychotic behaviors.

    “demented pet owners were less likely to exhibit verbal aggression but were otherwise similar to non-pet owners in likelihood of vegetative, hyperactive, or psychotic behaviors [17].”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
FRITZ, C. L., FARVER, T. B., KASS, P. H., & HART, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Published
1995-07
Volume
183
Issue
7
Pages
459-463
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009200408
Cited by
116
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, companion animals, pet ownership, non-cognitive symptoms, agitation, verbal aggression, anxiety, mood disorders, cognitive decline, animal-assisted interventions, home-dwelling patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aggression, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Mental Disorders, Human-Animal Bond, Cognition Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence, Caregivers, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review