Cited by 121Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipContemporary Christian Leadership and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Religious Needs and Resources of Psychiatric Inpatients

FITCHETT, GEORGE, BURTON, LAUREL ARTHUR, SIVAN, ABIGAIL B.·1997·The Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

A recent survey of psychiatric research indicates religion has been given little attention, and when it has been considered, the measures have been simplistic. The present study was designed to describe the religious needs and resources of psychiatric inpatients. With the use of a multidimensional conception of religion and two established instruments, 51 adult psychiatric inpatients were surveyed about their religious needs and resources. For comparison, 50 general medical/surgical patients, matched for age and gender, were also surveyed. Eighty-eight percent of the psychiatric patients reported three or more current religious needs. Although there were no differences in religious needs between the two patient groups, there were significant differences in religious resources. Psychiatric patients had lower spiritual well-being scores and were less likely to have talked with their clergy. Religion is important for the psychiatric patients, but they may need assistance to find resources to address their religious needs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005053-199705000-00006

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across the three reviews, survival among frequent attendees was increased on average by 37%, 43%, and 30%, with a mean effect of 37%.

    “Survival among frequent attendees was increased on average by 37%, 43%, and 30% (mean effect being 37% across these reviews).”
  • In these three reviews, the effects on survival have been particularly strong for frequency of attendance at religious services.

    “The effects have been particularly strong for frequency of attendance at religious services in these three reviews.”
  • A systematic review and two meta-analyses have confirmed the relationship between R/S and longer survival.

    “Another systematic review [570] and two meta-analyses [571, 572] have confirmed this relationship between R/S and longer survival.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
FITCHETT, G., BURTON, L. A., & SIVAN, A. B.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Venue
The Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
1997-05
Volume
185
Issue
5
Pages
320-326
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994611260
Cited by
121
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
Keywords
religious needs, religious resources, psychiatric inpatients, spiritual well-being
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aftercare, Aged, Attitude, Mental Disorders, Clergy, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pastoral Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Religion and Psychology, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review