The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Refugee Trauma versus Torture Trauma: A Retrospective Controlled Cohort Study of Tibetan Refugees
Abstract
A retrospective cohort study of 35 refugee Tibetan nuns and lay students who were arrested and tortured in Tibet matched with 35 controls who were not arrested or tortured was carried out in India. Subjects were administered the Hopkins Checklist-25, evaluating anxiety symptoms, effective disturbances, somatic complaints, and social impairment. The prevalence of symptom scores in the clinical range for both cohorts was 41.4% for anxiety symptoms and 14.3% for depressive symptoms. The torture survivors had a statistically significant higher proportion of elevated anxiety scores than did the nontortured cohort (54.3% vs. 28.6%, p = .05). This was not true for elevated depressive scores. The results suggest that torture has long-term consequences on mental health over and above the effects of being uprooted, fleeing one's country, and living in exile as a refugee, though the additional effects were small. Political commitment, social support in exile, and prior knowledge of and preparedness for confinement and torture in the imprisoned cohort served to foster resilience against psychological sequelae. The contribution of Buddhist spirituality plays an active role in the development of protective coping mechanisms among Tibetan refugees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1987) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.144.4.497 · Cited by 712
Psychological responses to war and atrocity: The limitations of current concepts
Bracken, P. J., Giller, J. E., & Summerfield, D. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)00181-r · Cited by 571
The role of self-understanding in resilient individuals: The development of a perspective.
Beardslee, W. R. (1989) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1989.tb01659.x · Cited by 246
Cited by
Bhugra, D. (2004) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1046/j.0001-690x.2003.00246.x · Cited by 1,196
Mental Health, Social Functioning, and Disability in Postwar Afghanistan
Cardozo, B. L. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.5.575 · Cited by 445
Laban, C. J., Gernaat, H. B. P. E., Komproe, I. H., Schreuders, B. A., & De Jong, J. T. V. M. (2004) · Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000146739.26187.15 · Cited by 444
Mental Health Problems Among Adults in Tsunami-Affected Areas in Southern Thailand
van Griensven, F. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.5.537 · Cited by 398
Siriwardhana, C., Ali, S. S., Roberts, B., & Stewart, R. (2014) · Conflict and Health · doi:10.1186/1752-1505-8-13 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- HOLTZ, T. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-34
- ISSN
- 0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2312505313
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refugee Trauma versus Torture Trauma: A Retrospective Controlled Cohort Study of Tibetan Refugees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005053-199801000-00005
- The paper
- HOLTZ, T. H. (1998). Refugee Trauma versus Torture Trauma: A Retrospective Controlled Cohort Study of Tibetan Refugees. The Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199801000-00005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.