Cited by 183Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Three-dimensional analysis of the relationship between synaptic pathology and neuropil threads in Alzheimer disease

Masliah, E, Ellisman, M, Carragher, B, Mallory, M, Young, S, Hansen, L, Deteresa, R, Terry, R D·1992·Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that the Alzheimer disease (AD) neocortex is characterized by a loss of large neurons, the presence of dilated terminal axons, widespread loss of synapses, and a disruption of the dendritic cytoskeleton which is manifested as Tau immunoreactive threads. In the present study we have investigated the relationship between synaptic and dendritic abnormalities in the neocortex of Alzheimer patients and examined the extent to which these structural alterations correlate with the severity of cognitive impairment in AD. Quantitative neuroanatomical data were obtained from immunofluorescence-labeled specimens using a laser-scanning confocal microscope, computer-assisted image processing and serial section reconstruction techniques. We found that the AD cases showed a 34% loss in the number of presynaptic terminals per 100 square (sq) microns, many of which showed structural abnormalities. The AD neuropil had an average of 10 +/- 7 dendritic threads per 1,000 sq microns, with the average thread measuring 2 sq microns. Severe AD cases had thicker threads compared with mild to moderate AD cases. Three-dimensional analysis showed clustering of synapses around threads, as well as presynaptic boutons apposed to dendritic neuropil threads. Statistical analysis showed that the strongest correlation was between synapse density and Blessed score of cognitive impairment. Thread counts did not correlate with either but were correlated with tangle counts. Stepwise multipl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005072-199207000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are studies suggesting a strong correlation between the loss of synaptic markers and the presence of neurofibrillary tangles.

    “Indeed, there are studies suggesting a strong correlation between the loss of synaptic markers and the presence of neurofibrillary tangles (Terry et al., 1991; Honer et al., 1992; Masliah et al., 1992; Wakabayashi et al., 1994; Lue et al., 1996; Samuel et al., 1997; Heffernan et al., 1998).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masliah, E., Ellisman, M., Carragher, B., Mallory, M., Young, S., Hansen, L., Deteresa, R., & Terry, R. D.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Masliah, E
Venue
Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology
Published
1992-07
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
404-414
ISSN
0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032687897
Cited by
183
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG 08205, AG05131, P50AG005131, R01AG008205, AG08201, R01AG008201)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, synaptic pathology, neuropil threads, presynaptic terminals, synaptic density, neurofibrillary tangles, dendritic cytoskeleton, cognitive impairment, neocortex
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Dendrites, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Lasers, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Synapses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review