Cited by 102Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Relationship between plaques, tangles, and loss of cortical cholinergic fibers in alzheimer disease

Geula, Changiz, Mesulam, M. -Marsel, Saroff, Daniel M., Wu, Chuang-Kuo·1998·Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Recent observations in our laboratory have indicated substantial and systematic regional variations in the loss of cortical cholinergic fibers in Alzheimer disease (AD). Previous attempts to study the relationship between cortical cholinergic loss and the density of cortical pathological lesions have resulted in conflicting findings. Furthermore, most reports have correlated density of plaques and tangles with the residual level of cholinergic innervation rather than its loss. The purpose of the present study was to determine the relationship between loss of cholinergic axons and density of tangles and beta-amyloid (Abeta) deposits in various cortical areas of AD brains. Abeta deposits and tangles were observed throughout the cerebral cortex. Quantitative analysis revealed almost no correlation between loss of cholinergic fibers and the density of Abeta deposits. Qualitative observations revealed similar results when cored and neuritic plaques were considered separately. By contrast, cholinergic fiber loss displayed a significant correlation with the density of tangles (r = 0.52-0.79). However, in a few areas, such as the cingulate cortex, tangle density appeared to be unrelated to the loss of cholinergic fibers. These results indicate that cortical cholinergic denervation in AD is related to cytoskeletal pathology. However, the lack of a perfect relationship with cytoskeletal pathology implicates additional factors in the cholinergic pathology of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005072-199801000-00008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geula, C., Mesulam, M. M., Saroff, D. M., & Wu, C.-K.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Geula, Changiz
Venue
Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology
Published
1998-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
63-75
ISSN
0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092211788
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG 10282, R29AG010282)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, neurofibrillary tangles, amyloid plaques, neuritic plaques, regional variation, cholinergic innervation
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cerebral Cortex, Choline O-Acetyltransferase, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Nerve Fibers, Organ Specificity, Reference Values, Regression Analysis, Thiazoles, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Benzothiazoles, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review