The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analysis of Correlates of Provider Behavior in Medical Encounters
Abstract
This article summarizes the results of 41 independent studies containing correlates of objectively measured provider behaviors in medical encounters. Provider behaviors were grouped a priori into the process categories of information giving, questions, competence, partnership building, and socioemotional behavior. Total amount of communication was also included. All correlations between variables within these categories and external variables (patient outcome variables or patient and provider background variables) were extracted. The most frequently occurring outcome variables were satisfaction, recall, and compliance, and the most frequently occurring background variables were the patient's gender, age, and social class. Average correlations and combined significance levels were calculated for each combination of process category and external variable. Results showed significant relations of small to moderate average magnitude between these external variables and almost all of the provider behavior categories. A theory of provider-patient reciprocation is proposed to account for the pattern of results.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore healthcare professionals tend to involve low SES patients less in their consultations by giving them less information, spending less time building rapport with them and listening less attentively (9,11,12).”
From High levels of socioeconomic deprivation do not inhibit patients’ communication of concerns in head and neck cancer review clinics (2018) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“This study revealed a positive relationship between patient's social class (measured by income, education or other, non-specified social class indices) and information giving.”
From Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? (2005) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“Although a link between these aspects of affective behaviour and the patients' satisfaction and compliance can be identified, none of these determinants were found to be related to any determinant of the patients' social class.(24)”
From Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? (2005) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Quantitative methods for literature reviews
Green, B. F., & Hall, J. A. (1984) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.000345 · Cited by 213
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care.
Smedley, B. D., Stith, A. Y., & Nelson, A. (2003) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · doi:10.13016/1bbm-d7bq · Cited by 6,567
Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health
Courtenay, W. H. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00390-1 · Cited by 4,091
“Men are provided with fewer and briefer explanations Ð both simple and technical Ð in medical encounters (Waitzkin, 1984; Hall et al., 1988; Weisman and Teitelbaum, 1989).”
BackgroundTervalon, M., & Murray-García, J. (1998) · Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved · doi:10.1353/hpu.2010.0233 · Cited by 3,646
“Are faculty members required to undergo multicultural training as are the youngest students of the profession?”
Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature
Ong, L. M. L., de Haes, J. C. J. M., Hoos, A. M., & Lammes, F. B. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-m · Cited by 2,430
Doyle, C., Lennox, L., & Bell, D. (2013) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570 · Cited by 2,666
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, J. A., Roter, D. L., & Katz, N. R.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hall, Judith A.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 1988-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 657-675
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071796477
- Cited by
- 1,069
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 8.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- provider behavior, healthcare encounters, patient-provider communication, information giving, provider competence, partnership development, social-emotional behavior, patient satisfaction, medication adherence, patient characteristics
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Ambulatory Care, Bibliographies as Topic, Communication, Consumer Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Physician-Patient Relations, Professional-Patient Relations, Mental Recall, Social Class
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review