Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 499

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Awareness-to-Adherence Model of the Steps to Clinical Guideline Compliance: The Case of Pediatric Vaccine Recommendations

PATHMAN, DONALD E., KONRAD, THOMAS R., FREED, GARY L., FREEMAN, VICTORIA A., KOCH, GARY G.·1996·Medical Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This article proposes, tests, and explores the potential applications of a model of the cognitive and behavioral steps physicians take when they comply with national clinical practice guidelines. The authors propose that when physicians comply with practice guidelines, they must first become aware of the guidelines, then intellectually agree with them, then decide to adopt them in the care they provide, then regularly adhere to them at appropriate times. METHODS: Data used to test this model address physicians' responses to national pediatric vaccine recommendations. Questionnaires were mailed to 3,014 family physicians and pediatricians who were working in communities of various sizes in nine states. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 66.2%. In the case of the recommendation to provide hepatitis B vaccine to all infants, guideline awareness among respondents was 98.4%, agreement 70.4%, adoption 77.7%, and adherence 30.1%. The data for 87.9% of physicians fit the model at every step. Significant deviation from the model occurred only for the 11% of all physicians who adopted the hepatitis B recommendation without agreeing with it. In the case of the recommendation to provide the acellular variety of the pertussis vaccine for children's fourth and fifth pertussis doses, guideline awareness among respondents was 89.8%, agreement 66.5%, adoption 46.3%, and adherence 35.2%. Data fit the model at every step for 90.6% of physicians. Greater likelihood of movement from each step to the next in the path to adherence was found for physicians with certain characteristics, information sources, and beliefs about the vaccines, and those in certain types of practice settings. Specific physician and practice characteristics typically predicted movement along only one or two of the steps to adherence to either the hepatitis B or acellular pertussis recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: These data on physicians' use of pediatric vaccine recommendations generally support the awareness-to-adherence model. This model may prove useful in identifying ways to improve physicians' adherence to a variety of guidelines by demonstrating where physicians fall off the path to adherence, which physicians are at greatest risk for not attaining each step in the path, and factors associated with a greater likelihood of attaining each step toward guideline adherence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005650-199609000-00002

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 499

Metadata

Authors
PATHMAN, D. E., KONRAD, T. R., FREED, G. L., FREEMAN, V. A., & KOCH, G. G.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
1996-09
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
873-889
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2316188001
Cited by
499
References
23
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Awareness-to-Adherence Model of the Steps to Clinical Guideline Compliance: The Case of Pediatric Vaccine Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005650-199609000-00002
The paper
PATHMAN, D. E., KONRAD, T. R., FREED, G. L., FREEMAN, V. A., & KOCH, G. G. (1996). The Awareness-to-Adherence Model of the Steps to Clinical Guideline Compliance: The Case of Pediatric Vaccine Recommendations. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199609000-00002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.