The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Awareness-to-Adherence Model of the Steps to Clinical Guideline Compliance: The Case of Pediatric Vaccine Recommendations
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This article proposes, tests, and explores the potential applications of a model of the cognitive and behavioral steps physicians take when they comply with national clinical practice guidelines. The authors propose that when physicians comply with practice guidelines, they must first become aware of the guidelines, then intellectually agree with them, then decide to adopt them in the care they provide, then regularly adhere to them at appropriate times. METHODS: Data used to test this model address physicians' responses to national pediatric vaccine recommendations. Questionnaires were mailed to 3,014 family physicians and pediatricians who were working in communities of various sizes in nine states. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 66.2%. In the case of the recommendation to provide hepatitis B vaccine to all infants, guideline awareness among respondents was 98.4%, agreement 70.4%, adoption 77.7%, and adherence 30.1%. The data for 87.9% of physicians fit the model at every step. Significant deviation from the model occurred only for the 11% of all physicians who adopted the hepatitis B recommendation without agreeing with it. In the case of the recommendation to provide the acellular variety of the pertussis vaccine for children's fourth and fifth pertussis doses, guideline awareness among respondents was 89.8%, agreement 66.5%, adoption 46.3%, and adherence 35.2%. Data fit the model at every step for 90.6% of physicians. Greater likelihood of movement from each step to the next in the path to adherence was found for physicians with certain characteristics, information sources, and beliefs about the vaccines, and those in certain types of practice settings. Specific physician and practice characteristics typically predicted movement along only one or two of the steps to adherence to either the hepatitis B or acellular pertussis recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: These data on physicians' use of pediatric vaccine recommendations generally support the awareness-to-adherence model. This model may prove useful in identifying ways to improve physicians' adherence to a variety of guidelines by demonstrating where physicians fall off the path to adherence, which physicians are at greatest risk for not attaining each step in the path, and factors associated with a greater likelihood of attaining each step toward guideline adherence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sociobehavioral Determinants of Compliance with Health and Medical Care Recommendations
Becker, M. H., & Maiman, L. A. (1975) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-197501000-00002 · Cited by 1,582
Do Practice Guidelines Guide Practice?
Lomas, J., Anderson, G. M., Domnick-Pierre, K., Vayda, E., Enkin, M. W., & Hannah, W. J. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198911093211906 · Cited by 1,234
Changing Physicians' Practices
Greco, P. J., & Eisenberg, J. M. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199310213291714 · Cited by 977
Lomas, J. (1991) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.265.17.2202 · Cited by 575
Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on Physician Practice
Kosecoff, J. (1987) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03400190090034 · Cited by 406
Simultaneous Tests of Many Hypotheses in Exploratory Research
GROVE, W. M., & ANDREASEN, N. C. (1982) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198201000-00002 · Cited by 375
(2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/2197 · Cited by 373
Montaño, D. E., & Phillips, W. R. (1995) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.85.6.795 · Cited by 349
Improving Physician Compliance With Preventive Medicine Guidelines
Cohen, D. I., Littenberg, B., Wetzel, C., & Neuhauser, D. V. (1982) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198210000-00006 · Cited by 264
Cited by
Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement
Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powe, N. R., Wu, A. W., Wilson, M. H., Abboud, P.-A. C., & Rubin, H. R. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458 · Cited by 6,677
Bridging Research and Practice
Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024 · Cited by 1,386
Planning and Studying Improvement in Patient Care: The Use of Theoretical Perspectives
GROL, R. P. T. M., BOSCH, M. C., HULSCHER, M. E. J. L., ECCLES, M. P., & WENSING, M. (2007) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x · Cited by 943
Viswanathan, M., Golin, C. E., Jones, C. D., Ashok, M., Blalock, S. J., Wines, R. C. M., Coker-Schwimmer, E. J. L., Rosen, D. L., Sista, P., & Lohr, K. N. (2012) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00538 · Cited by 754
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
Glasziou, P., Meats, E., Heneghan, C., & Shepperd, S. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39590.732037.47 · Cited by 614
Metadata
- Authors
- PATHMAN, D. E., KONRAD, T. R., FREED, G. L., FREEMAN, V. A., & KOCH, G. G.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 873-889
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2316188001
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 10.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Awareness-to-Adherence Model of the Steps to Clinical Guideline Compliance: The Case of Pediatric Vaccine Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005650-199609000-00002
- The paper
- PATHMAN, D. E., KONRAD, T. R., FREED, G. L., FREEMAN, V. A., & KOCH, G. G. (1996). The Awareness-to-Adherence Model of the Steps to Clinical Guideline Compliance: The Case of Pediatric Vaccine Recommendations. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199609000-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.