The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer screening by primary care physicians: a comparison of rates obtained from physician self-report, patient survey, and chart audit.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES. This study measured the cancer screening rates of family physicians and compared the measures obtained through physician self-reports, chart audits, and patient surveys. METHODS. A cancer screening survey was sent to 50% of the members of the Washington Academy of Family Physicians, with 326 family physicians (74% response rate) completing the survey. Sixty physicians were recruited for the patient survey and chart audit phase, with a 90% participation rate. Patient surveys were conducted with about 350 patients per physician, and chart audits were conducted on a subset of about 50 patients per physician. Each physician's rate of providing each service was computed from the self-report, the patient survey, and the chart audit. RESULTS. Physicians provided many of these services at rates different from those commonly recommended. Large discrepancies were found between the rates measured by different methods. Correlations between rates derived from chart audits and patient surveys were high; however, correlations between rates from physician self-report and either patient survey or chart audit were much lower for all services. CONCLUSIONS. Studies of physicians' provision of cancer prevention services should not rely on physician self-report, but should obtain the rates through patient surveys or chart audits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preventive Care for Women -- Does the Sex of the Physician Matter?
Lurie, N., Slater, J., McGovern, P., Ekstrum, J., Quam, L., & Margolis, K. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199308123290707 · Cited by 503
McPhee, S. J. (1991) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.266.4.538 · Cited by 257
McPhee, S. J., Richard, R. J., & Solkowitz, S. N. (1986) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02596202 · Cited by 241
Cancer: improving early detection and prevention. A community practice randomised trial.
Dietrich, A. J., O'Connor, G. T., Keller, A., Carney, P. A., Levy, D., & Whaley, F. S. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6828.687 · Cited by 236
Internists' Practices in Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: A Survey
Schwartz, J. S., Lewis, C. E., Clancy, C., Kinosian, M. S., Radany, M. H., & Koplan, J. P. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-1-46 · Cited by 204
Preventive content of adult primary care: do generalists and subspecialists differ?
Dietrich, A. J., & Goldberg, H. I. (1984) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.74.3.223 · Cited by 109
A controlled trial to improve delivery of preventive care
Turner, B. J., Day, S. C., & Borenstein, B. D. (1989) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02599691 · Cited by 109
Prevention in Primary Care: Variability in Physician Practice Patterns in New York City
Gemson, D. H., & Elinson, J. (1986) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(18)31333-3 · Cited by 109
Determinants of Primary Medical Practice in Adult Cancer Prevention
Battista, R. N., Williams, J., & MacFarlane, L. A. (1986) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198603000-00004 · Cited by 85
Survey of Physicians' Attitudes And Practices in Early Cancer Detection
(1985) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.35.4.197 · Cited by 78
Cited by
Breen, N., Wagener, D. K., Brown, M. L., Davis, W. W., & Ballard-Barbash, R. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.22.1704 · Cited by 502
PATHMAN, D. E., KONRAD, T. R., FREED, G. L., FREEMAN, V. A., & KOCH, G. G. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199609000-00002 · Cited by 499
Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States
Ioannou, G. N., Chapko, M. K., & Dominitz, J. A. (2003) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07574.x · Cited by 289
Reasons for Pediatrician Nonadherence to Asthma Guidelines
Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Becher, O. J., & Rubin, H. R. (2001) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.155.9.1057 · Cited by 282
Barriers to providing lung-protective ventilation to patients with acute lung injury
Rubenfeld, G. D., Cooper, C., Carter, G., Thompson, B. T., & Hudson, L. D. (2004) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000127266.39560.96 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Montaño, D. E., & Phillips, W. R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 795-800
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2008083399
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer screening by primary care physicians: a comparison of rates obtained from physician self-report, patient survey, and chart audit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.85.6.795
- The paper
- Montaño, D. E., & Phillips, W. R. (1995). Cancer screening by primary care physicians: a comparison of rates obtained from physician self-report, patient survey, and chart audit. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.85.6.795
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.