The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of the CSA activity monitor as a measure of children's physical activity using energy expenditure (EE) as a criterion measure. METHODS: Thirty subjects aged 10 to 14 performed three 5-min treadmill bouts at 3, 4, and 6 mph, respectively. While on the treadmill, subjects wore CSA (WAM 7164) activity monitors on the right and left hips. VO2 was monitored continuously by an automated system. EE was determined by multiplying the average VO2 by the caloric equivalent of the mean respiratory exchange ratio. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVA indicated that both CSA monitors were sensitive to changes in treadmill speed. Mean activity counts from each CSA unit were not significantly different and the intraclass reliability coefficient for the two CSA units across all speeds was 0.87. Activity counts from both CSA units were strongly correlated with EE (r = 0.86 and 0.87, P < 0.001). An EE prediction equation was developed from 20 randomly selected subjects and cross-validated on the remaining 10. The equation predicted mean EE within 0.01 kcal.min-1. The correlation between actual and predicted values was 0.93 (P < 0.01) and the SEE was 0.93 kcal.min-1. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the CSA monitor is a valid and reliable tool for quantifying treadmill walking and running in children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children
Evenson, K. R., Catellier, D. J., Gill, K., Ondrak, K. S., & McMurray, R. G. (2008) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410802334196 · Cited by 2,677
Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research
TROST, S. G., MCIVER, K. L., & PATE, R. R. (2005) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000185657.86065.98 · Cited by 2,033
Self-citationNeighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation
Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., Black, J. B., & Chen, D. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.9.1552 · Cited by 1,954
Physical activity levels and patterns of 9- and 15-yr-old European children
RIDDOCH, C. J., BO ANDERSEN, L., WEDDERKOPP, N., HARRO, M., KLASSON-HEGGEBØ, L., SARDINHA, L. B., COOPER, A. R., & EKELUND, U. (2004) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000106174.43932.92 · Cited by 900
Measurement of Adults' Sedentary Time in Population-Based Studies
Healy, G. N., Clark, B. K., Winkler, E. A. H., Gardiner, P. A., Brown, W. J., & Matthews, C. E. (2011) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.005 · Cited by 628
Metadata
- Authors
- TROST, S. G., WARD, D. S., MOOREHEAD, S. M., WATSON, P. D., RINER, W., & BURKE, J. R.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 629-633
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1510988155
- Cited by
- 763
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005768-199804000-00023
- The paper
- TROST, S. G., WARD, D. S., MOOREHEAD, S. M., WATSON, P. D., RINER, W., & BURKE, J. R. (1998). Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199804000-00023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.