Cited by 628Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Measurement of Adults' Sedentary Time in Population-Based Studies

Open access
Healy, Genevieve N., Clark, Bronwyn K., Winkler, Elisabeth A.H., Gardiner, Paul A., Brown, Wendy J., Matthews, Charles E.·2011·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Sedentary time (too much sitting) increasingly is being recognized as a distinct health risk behavior. This paper reviews the reliability and validity of self-reported and device-based sedentary time measures and provides recommendations for their use in population-based studies. The focus is on instruments that have been used in free-living, population-based research in adults. Data from the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey are utilized to compare the descriptive epidemiology of sedentary time that arises from the use of different sedentary time measures. A key recommendation from this review is that, wherever possible, population-based monitoring of sedentary time should incorporate both self-reported measures (to capture important domain- and behavior-specific sedentary time information) and device-based measures (to measure both total sedentary time and patterns of sedentary time accumulation).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.005

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accelerometers measure sitting time in a different manner to questionnaires.

    “As accelerometers have been shown to measure sitting time in a different manner to questionnaires[31]”

    From Daily Sitting Time and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis (2013) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Models were run with the Koster et al accelerometer study included and excluded to see if the results were changed with inclusion of this paper.

    “As accelerometers have been shown to measure sitting time in a different manner to questionnaires[31], we ran models with this study included and excluded, to see if the results were changed with inclusion of this paper.”

    From Daily Sitting Time and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis (2013) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Five of six included studies assessed total sitting time via single-item self-report, and measurement error could have led to misclassification and attenuation of risk estimates.

    “Five of the six studies included in this meta-analysis assessed total sitting time through single-item self-report measures, and measurement error in reported sitting time could have led to misclassification and attenuation of the risk estimates observed in these studies[31,37].”

    From Daily Sitting Time and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis (2013) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Healy, G. N., Clark, B. K., Winkler, E. A. H., Gardiner, P. A., Brown, W. J., & Matthews, C. E.
Affiliations
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
216-227
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989613701
Cited by
628
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 23
FWCI
24.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 CA999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Keywords
sedentary time, sitting behavior, self-reported sedentary time, accelerometry, reliability and validity, measurement agreement, NHANES, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, Nutrition Surveys, Risk, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Health Behavior, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review