The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales
Abstract
Borg's Perceived Exertioin and Pain Scales Author: BORG, Gunnar, PhD (Stockholm Univ) Bibliographic Data: (ISBN: 0880116234, Human Kinetics Inc, 1998, $24.00), 104 pages, soft cover. Audience 1: Exercise Scientists Audience 2: Physiotherapists Other Info: The book contains black-and-white illustrations. DESCRIPTION: This is a new edition of a book on perceived exertion and pain scales written by the developer of the scales himself. It is a compilation of the development, proper use (including validity and reliability), and research using the Borg ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) scale and the Borg category-ratio (CR10) scale. PURPOSE: The purpose is to present two scales: the Borg RPE scale and the Borg CR10 scale. The emphasis is on viewing humans as a psychosomatic whole and using human perception as a diagnostic instrument. In view of the common use of these scales in clinical, research, and everyday settings, the objectives of the book are certainly worthwhile. With the use of numerous investigations, and the insight only the developer of the scales can give, the author more than meets his objectives. AUDIENCE: He has written a book that truly targets a large audience that includes: exercise scientists, physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, physical education teachers, exercise supervisors, and coaches and athletes. As the developer of the scales and the first author on more than 50 articles and chapters that pertain to the scales, Borg is the most credible author available to write this kind of book. FEATURES: This book is well presented with numerous helpful figures throughout. Two unique features add to its appeal. Gray boxes of text appear throughout the book that provide interesting stories and insights from the author. The perforated scales and instructions on thick paper located in the appendix are also useful. ASSESSMENT: This book is an essential resource for anyone who regularly uses the Borg RPE or the Borg CR10 scale. The explanations of the development and the appropriateness of use give better insight into why the scales are used and how they can be better used. SCORE: Weighted Numerical Score: 93 - **** Reviewed by: Edward M. Heath, PhD (University of Texas El Paso College of Nursing & Health Sciences)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Effects of Mental Fatigue on Physical Performance: A Systematic Review
Van Cutsem, J., Marcora, S., De Pauw, K., Bailey, S., Meeusen, R., & Roelands, B. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0672-0 · Cited by 924
Position statement on physical activity and exercise intensity terminology.
Norton, K., Norton, L., & Sadgrove, D. (2010) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2009.09.008 · Cited by 804
A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work tests
Borg, E., & Kaijser, L. (2006) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00448.x · Cited by 558
Ekkekakis, P., Hall, E. E., & Petruzzello, S. J. (2008) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-008-9025-z · Cited by 429
Exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a biopsychosocial approach
Booth, J., Moseley, G. L., Schiltenwolf, M., Cashin, A., Davies, M., & Hübscher, M. (2017) · Musculoskeletal Care · doi:10.1002/msc.1191 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Heath, E. M.
- Venue
- Medicine& Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1461
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4240288471
- Cited by
- 3,037
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005768-199809000-00018
- The paper
- Heath, E. M. (1998). Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Medicine& Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199809000-00018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.