The DOI matches its Crossref record.
FAT ADAPTATION WITH CARBOHYDRATE RECOVERY PROMOTES METABOLIC ADAPTATIONS DURING PROLONGED CYCLING
Abstract
297 For five days 8 trained cyclists (VO2peak 64.6 ±1.8 ml.kg−1.min) consumed either a high-carbohydrate (CHO) diet (9.6 g CHO.kg−1.d, 0.7 g fat.kg−1.d) or an isoenergetic high-fat (FAT) diet (2.4 g CHO.kg−1.d, 4.0 g carbohydrate.kg−1.d) while undertaking supervised daily training. On day 6, a high-CHO diet and rest were undertaken to restore muscle [glycogen] prior to performance testing on day 7. Adaptation to a FAT diet reduced RER during cycling at 70% of VO2peak; this was partially restored by 1 d of high-CHO (0.90 ±0.01, 0.82 ±0.01*, 0.87 ±0.01* for baseline, day 6 and day 7 respectively, *P<0.05). Corresponding RER values after the high-CHO diet were 0.91 ±0.01, 0.88 ±0.01* and 0.93 ±0.01*. On day 7, total fat oxidation was increased (94 ±6 vs. 61 ±5 g*) while carbohydrate oxidation was decreased (346 ±14 vs. 270 ±16 g*) throughout 2 hr of cycling at 70% VO2peak for FAT vs. CHO. Plasma [glucose] was better maintained throughout the 2 hr cycling after the FAT compared to the CHO diet. Performance of a subsequent time-trial (7 kJ.kg−1) was 30.73 ±1.12 vs. 34.17 ±2.48 min for FAT and CHO, mean improvement 8%, 95% CI −5.5% to 21%). These data show significant metabolic adaptations occur with a brief (5 d) period of FAT diet followed by CHO recovery. Although not statistically significant, the potential for performance enhancement could be meaningful to competitive cyclists undertaking a similar exercise challenge (2-3 hr cycling without CHO intake during the event).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Burke and colleagues [49–52] performed a series of short-term, low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet studies and one of their observations was that 5 days on a low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet already showed some adaptations to that diet that could not be reversed completely by refilling muscle glycogen stores.”
From Periodized Nutrition for Athletes (2017) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Enzymes involved in fat oxidation were upregulated and fat oxidation was increased [49].”
From Periodized Nutrition for Athletes (2017) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Periodized Nutrition for Athletes
Jeukendrup, A. E. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0694-2 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Burke, L. M., Angus, D. J., Cox, G. R., Gawthorn, K. M., Hawley, J. A., Febbraio, M. A., & Hargreaves, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- RMIT University (AU)
- Deakin University (AU)
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- Supplement
- Pages
- S91
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994485556
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- high-fat diet, carbohydrate recovery, fat oxidation, carbohydrate oxidation, respiratory exchange ratio, muscle glycogen, plasma glucose, time trial performance, endurance cycling, metabolic adaptation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review