The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of direct supervision of resistance training on strength performance
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare changes in maximal strength, power, and muscular endurance after 12 wk of periodized heavy-resistance training directly supervised by a personal trainer (SUP) versus unsupervised training (UNSUP). METHODS: Twenty moderately trained men aged 24.6 +/- 1.0 yr (mean +/- SE) were randomly assigned to either the SUP group (N = 10) or the UNSUP group (N = 8). Both groups performed identical linear periodized resistance training programs consisting of preparatory (10-12 repetitions maximum (RM)), hypertrophy (8 to 10-RM), strength (5 to 8-RM), and peaking phases (3 to 6-RM) using free-weight and variable-resistance machine exercises. Subjects were tested for maximal squat and bench press strength (1-RM), squat jump power output, bench press muscular endurance, and body composition at week 0 and after 12 wk of training. RESULTS: Mean training loads (kg per set) per week were significantly (P < 0.05) greater in the SUP group than the UNSUP group at weeks 7 through 11 for the squat, and weeks 3 and 7 through 12 for the bench press exercises. The rates of increase (slope) of squat and bench press kg per set were significantly greater in the SUP group. Maximal squat and bench press strength were significantly greater at week 12 in the SUP group. Squat and bench press 1-RM, and mean and peak power output increased significantly after training in both groups. Relative local muscular endurance (80% of 1-RM) was not compromised in either group despite significantly greater loads utilized in bench press muscular endurance testing after training. Body mass, fat mass, and fat-free mass increased significantly after training in the SUP group. CONCLUSION: Directly supervised, heavy-resistance training in moderately trained men resulted in a greater rate of training load increase and magnitude which resulted in greater maximal strength gains compared with unsupervised training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Skeletal muscle adaptations during early phase of heavy-resistance training in men and women.
Staron, R. S., Karapondo, D. L., Kraemer, W. J., Fry, A. C., Gordon, S. E., Falkel, J. E., Hagerman, F. C., & Hikida, R. S. (1994) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1994.76.3.1247 · Cited by 796 · cited 1×
“Improvements in strength are typically attributed to neurologic adaptations, muscle fiber transformations, and muscle fiber hypertrophy (27,32,35,37).”
BackgroundKraemer, W. J., Patton, J. F., Gordon, S. E., Harman, E. A., Deschenes, M. R., Reynolds, K., Newton, R. U., Triplett, N. T., & Dziados, J. E. (1995) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1995.78.3.976 · Cited by 782 · cited 3×
“Previous studies that have utilized individually supervised training in moderately trained subjects have shown improvements in leg press strength performance of 26 and 30% after 19 and 12 wk of resistance training, respectively (5,21).”
BackgroundSelf-citationStrength and Power Training: Physiological Mechanisms of Adaptation
KRAEMER, W. J., FLECK, S. J., & EVANS, W. J. (1996) · Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews · doi:10.1249/00003677-199600240-00014 · Cited by 298
Self-citationAnderson, T., & Kearney, J. T. (1982) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1982.10605218 · Cited by 197
Muscle fiber types and size in trained and untrained muscles of elite athletes
Tesch, P. A., & Karlsson, J. (1985) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1985.59.6.1716 · Cited by 197
Enzymatic adaptations consequent to long-term strength training
Tesch, P., Komi, P., & Häkkinen, K. (1987) · International Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1025706 · Cited by 101
Cited by
Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults
(2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181915670 · Cited by 4,332
Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults
(2002) · Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200202000-00027 · Cited by 2,979
Self-citationFundamentals of Resistance Training: Progression and Exercise Prescription
KRAEMER, W. J., & RATAMESS, N. A. (2004) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000121945.36635.61 · Cited by 1,992
Self-citationGarvey, W. T., Mechanick, J. I., Brett, E. M., Garber, A. J., Hurley, D. L., Jastreboff, A. M., Nadolsky, K., Pessah-Pollack, R., & Plodkowski, R. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep161365.gl · Cited by 1,914
A Meta-analysis to Determine the Dose Response for Strength Development
RHEA, M. R., ALVAR, B. A., BURKETT, L. N., & BALL, S. D. (2003) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000053727.63505.d4 · Cited by 666
Metadata
- Authors
- MAZZETTI, S. A., KRAEMER, W. J., VOLEK, J. S., DUNCAN, N. D., RATAMESS, N. A., G??MEZ, A. L., NEWTON, R. U., H??KKINEN, K., & FLECK, S. J.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1175-1184
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001850834
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.