Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Continuous Monitoring of Partial Pressure of Brain Tissue Oxygen in Patients with Severe Head Injury

Open access
van Santbrink, Henk, Maas, Andrew I.R., Avezaat, Cees J.J.·1996·Neurosurgery

Abstract

Ischemia is one of the major factors causing secondary brain damage after severe head injury. We have investigated the value of continuous partial pressure of brain tissue oxygen (PbrO2) monitoring as a parameter for cerebral oxygenation in 22 patients with severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score, < or = 8). Jugular bulb oxygenation, intracranial pressure, and cerebral perfusion pressure were simultaneously recorded. O2 and CO2 reactivity tests were performed daily to evaluate oxygen autoregulatory mechanisms. PbrO2 monitoring was started an average of 7.0 hours after trauma with a mean duration of 74.3 hours. No complications were seen, and the calibration of the catheters after measurement showed a zero drift of 1.2 +/- 0.8 mm Hg and a sensitivity drift of 9.7 +/- 5.3%. In 86% of patients, PbrO2 was < 20 mm Hg in the acute phase. Mean PbrO2 significantly increased during the first 24 hours after injury. Two distinct patterns of change of PbrO2 over time were noted. The first pattern was characterized by normal stable levels after 24 hours, and the second was characterized by transiently elevated levels of PbrO2 during the second and third days. PbrO2 values < or = 5 mm Hg within 24 hours after trauma negatively correlated with outcome. O2 reactivity was significantly lower in patients with good outcomes. CO2 reactivity showed no constant pattern of change over time and was not correlated with outcome. Increased hyperventilation was shown to decrease PbrO2 in some patients. Accurate detection of the moment of cerebral death was possible on the basis of the PbrO2 measurements. The correlation between PbrO2 and other parameters, such as intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure, was weak. We conclude that PbrO2 monitoring is a safe and clinically applicable method in patients with severe head injury. The early occurrence of ischemia after head injury can be monitored on a continuous basis. Deficiency of oxygen autoregulatory mechanisms can be demonstrated, and their occurrence is inversely related to outcome. For practical clinical use, the method seemed to be superior to jugular oximetry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006123-199601000-00007

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
van Santbrink, H., Maas, A. I. R., & Avezaat, C. J. J.
Venue
Neurosurgery
Published
1996-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
21-31
ISSN
  • 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4040
OpenAlex
W2162892324
Cited by
389
References
17
FWCI
18.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous Monitoring of Partial Pressure of Brain Tissue Oxygen in Patients with Severe Head Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006123-199601000-00007
The paper
van Santbrink, H., Maas, A. I. R., & Avezaat, C. J. J. (1996). Continuous Monitoring of Partial Pressure of Brain Tissue Oxygen in Patients with Severe Head Injury. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199601000-00007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.