The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ASSESSMENT OF OLDER PEOPLE: SELF-MAINTAINING AND INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING
Abstract
THE use of formal devices for assessing function is becoming standard in agencies serving the elderly. In the Gerontological Society's recent contract study on functional assessment (Howell, 1968), a large assortment of rating scales, checklists, and other techniques in use in applied settings was easily assembled. The present state of the trade seems to be one in which each investigator or practitioner feels an inner compusion to make his own scale and to cry that other existent scales cannot possibly fit his own setting. The authors join this company in presenting two scales first standardized on their own population (Lawton, 1969). They take some comfort, however, in the fact that one scale, the Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS), is largely a scale developed and used by other investigators (Lowenthal, 1964), which was adapted for use in our own institution. The second of the scales, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL), taps a level of functioning heretofore inadequately represented in attempts to assess everyday functional competence. Both of the scales have been tested further for their usefulness in a variety of types of institutions and other facilities serving community-resident older people. Before describing in detail the behavior measured by these two scales, we shall briefly describe the schema of competence into which these behaviors fit (Lawton, 1969). Human behavior is viewed as varying in the degree of complexity required for functioning in a variety of tasks. The lowest level is called life maintenance, followed by the successively more complex levels of func-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment
Jones, D. M., Song, X., & Rockwood, K. (2004) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52521.x · Cited by 605
Penninx, B. W. J. H., Pahor, M., Cesari, M., Corsi, A. M., Woodman, R. C., Bandinelli, S., Guralnik, J. M., & Ferrucci, L. (2004) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52208.x · Cited by 566
Ávila‐Funes, J. A., Amieva, H., Barberger‐Gateau, P., Le Goff, M., Raoux, N., Ritchie, K., Carrière, I., Tavernier, B., Tzourio, C., Gutiérrez‐Robledo, L. M., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02136.x · Cited by 517
Low mobility during hospitalization and functional decline in older adults
Zisberg, A., Shadmi, E., Sinoff, G., Gur‐Yaish, N., Srulovici, E., & Admi, H. (2011) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03276.x · Cited by 393
Borson, S., Scanlan, J. M., Watanabe, J., Tu, S., & Lessig, M. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53269.x · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- LAWTON, M. P., & BRODY, E. M.
- Venue
- Nursing Research
- Published
- 1970-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 278
- ISSN
- 0029-6562 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018057800
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ASSESSMENT OF OLDER PEOPLE: SELF-MAINTAINING AND INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006199-197005000-00029
- The paper
- LAWTON, M. P., & BRODY, E. M. (1970). ASSESSMENT OF OLDER PEOPLE: SELF-MAINTAINING AND INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING. Nursing Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-197005000-00029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.