Cited by 605Frailty in Older AdultsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesChronic Disease Management Strategies

Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment

Open access
Jones, David M., Song, Xiaowei, Rockwood, Kenneth·2004·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To construct and validate a frailty index (FI) that is clinically sensible and practical for geriatricians by basing it on a routinely used comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) instrument. Design: Secondary analysis of a 3‐month randomized, controlled trial of a specialized mobile geriatric assessment team. Setting: Rural Nova Scotia. Participants were seen in their homes. Participants: Frail older adults, of whom 92 were in the intervention group and 77 in the control group. Measurements: A standard CGA form that accounts for impairment, disability, and comorbidity burden was scored and summed as a frailty index (FI‐CGA). The FI‐GCA was stratified to describe three levels of frailty. Patients were followed for up to 12 months to determine how well the index predicted adverse outcomes (institutionalization or mortality, whichever came first). Results: The three levels of frailty were mild (FI‐CGA 0–7), moderate (FI‐CGA 7–13), and severe (FI‐CGA>13). Demographic and social traits were similar across groups, but greater frailty was associated with worse function ( r= 0.55) and mental status ( r= 0.33). Those with moderate and severe frailty had a greater risk of adverse outcomes than those with mild frailty (unadjusted hazard ratio=1.9 and 5.5, respectively). There was no difference between frailty groups in mean 3‐month goal‐attainment scaling scores. Intrarater reliability was 0.95. Conclusion: The FI‐CGA is a valid, reliable, and sensible clinical measure of frailty that permits risk stratification of future adverse outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52521.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complex interventions based on CGA delivered in the community can increase the likelihood of continuing to live at home, principally through reduced need for care home admission and reduced falls.

    “Complex interventions based on CGA delivered to older people in the community can increase the likelihood of continuing to live at home, principally through a reduced need for care home admission and reduced falls (115, 116)”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [116]

  • The Frailty Index was initially operationalized from a CGA by Jones et al and a standard procedure by Searle et al, and predicts death, length of stay, and discharge to long-term care in hospitalized older patients.

    “The Frailty Index was initially operationalized from a CGA by Jones et al and a standard procedure for creating a Frailty Index as described by Searle et al in 2008 (12,14), and shown to predict the risk of death, length of stay, and discharge to long term care in hospitalized older patients.(13)”
  • A Frailty Index can be calculated from a CGA in non-cancer patients and predicts length of stay, functional status, and mortality.

    “Rockwood and colleagues have shown that a Frailty Index based on a deficits accumulation principle (i.e. using information from a substantial number of indicators of a person’s health) can be calculated from information in a CGA in non-cancer patients, and used to predict subsequent events such as length of stay, functional status and mortality.(12,13)”
  • Both CGA-dependent tools predict death and institutionalisation in tightly graded patterns.

    “and both predict death and institutionalisation in tightly graded patterns.”

    From Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale (2006) · cites this paper as [20]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fried LP, Darer J, Walston J. Frailty. In: Cassel CK, Leipzip RM, Cohen HJ et al., eds Geriatric Medicine: An Evidence-Based Approach, 4th Ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp 1067-1076.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, D. M., Song, X., & Rockwood, K.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10-26
Volume
52
Issue
11
Pages
1929-1933
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1524996874
Cited by
605
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 28
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation
  • Dalhousie University
  • Health Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
frailty index, comprehensive geriatric assessment, frailty assessment, institutionalization, mortality, functional status, mental status, goal attainment scaling, intra-rater reliability, older adults, rural elderly
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Nova Scotia, ROC Curve, Geriatric Assessment, Proportional Hazards Models, Frail Elderly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review