Cited by 56Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

Gestational Age–Dependent Reference Values for pH in Umbilical Cord Arterial Blood at Term

Kitlinski, Margareta Laczna, Källén, Karin, Marsál, Karel, Olofsson, Per·2003·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite a change of fetal physiologic and biochemical functions with gestational age, stationary umbilical cord acid-base reference values are used as measures of obstetric care quality. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of low Apgar score relative to low pH when using stationary versus gestational age-adjusted reference values. METHODS: Umbilical artery pH was determined in 24,390 term singleton vaginal deliveries with a 5-minute Apgar score of 9 or greater. Low pH was defined as less than 7.10 as a stationary cutoff value, whereas pH less than (mean - 2 standard deviations [SDs]) was used when gestational age was considered. The 5-minute Apgar score less than 7 at low pH was studied in 44,978 term deliveries. RESULTS: A significant negative correlation was found between gestational age and umbilical artery pH. The odds ratio (OR) for pH less than 7.10 was continuously increasing, from 0.6 at 37 weeks to 1.5 at 42 weeks. In contrast, the OR for pH less than (mean - 2 SDs) was steady until 42 weeks, whereafter it increased (OR 1.24; 95% confidence interval 1.05, 1.47). A linear decrease of the association between Apgar score less than 7 and pH less than 7.10 with increasing pregnancy duration was found (P =.097), but for pH less than (mean - 2 SDs) there was no such association. CONCLUSION: We found a physiologic linear decline of umbilical artery pH with gestational age at term. Gestational age-adjusted umbilical cord artery pH reference values result in fewer diagnoses of cord acidemia than a stationary cutoff of pH less than 7.10.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006250-200308000-00023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitlinski, M. L., Källén, K., Marsál, K., & Olofsson, P.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2003-08
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
338-345
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051004762
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
umbilical cord pH, gestational age, reference values, Apgar score, term vaginal delivery, obstetric care quality, fetal acid-base status
MeSH terms
Apgar Score, Fetal Blood, Gestational Age, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Infant, Newborn, Reference Values, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review