The history of pain project
Abstract
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Box 356470, Seattle, WA 98195, USA Received 21 August 1997; accepted 22 August 1997 *Tel.: +1 206 5433570; fax: +1 206 5438315.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher anxiety levels are associated with greater pain sensitivity.
“Likewise, higher levels of anxiety are associated with increased pain sensitivity 236.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [236]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes
Meints, S. M., & Edwards, R. R. (2018) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.017 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
- Authors
- Loeser, J. D.
- Corresponding author
- Loeser, John D.
- ORCID
- Loeser, John D.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-2
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2328233910
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › History of Medical Practice
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- history of pain
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Pain, Research, History, 20th Century, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
