The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates undergoing extracorporal membrane oxygenation
Abstract
We evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in 18 infants who underwent ECMO therapy for severe respiratory failure and received gentamicin for possible sepsis. Twelve of these infants continued to receive gentamicin after ECMO had been discontinued. The volume of distribution (Vd) of gentamicin in the newborns receiving ECMO was 0.58 +/- 0.04 liter/kg, compared with a Vd of 0.45 +/- 0.02 liter/kg after ECMO had been discontinued (P = 0.02). The clearance of gentamicin in the patients undergoing ECMO was 42 +/- 3 ml/kg/hour compared with 57 +/- 4 ml/kg/hour in those patients off ECMO (P = 0.003). The elimination half-life in patients receiving ECMO was 10.0 +/- 0.7 hours compared with 5.7 +/- 0.4 hours after ECMO had been discontinued (P less than 0.0001). Neonates undergoing ECMO demonstrate a higher volume of distribution of gentamicin, a lower clearance, and consequently a longer half life for this drug. We conclude that gentamicin and probably other aminoglycosides should be given at dose rates about 25% lower than usual and at longer dosing intervals in patients undergoing ECMO therapy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While few trials exist which help to guide drug dosing on ECLS, a trend has emerged demonstrating a larger volume of distribution and extended elimination time while on ECLS.[8–12]”
From Phenobarbital use in an infant requiring extracorporeal membrane life support (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phenobarbital use in an infant requiring extracorporeal membrane life support
Tobias, J., Schloss, B., & Hayes, D. (2013) · Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.4103/0970-9185.105811 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- COHEN, P., COLLART, L., PROBER, C. G., FISCHER, A. F., & BLASCHKE, T. F.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Venue
- The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 562-565
- ISSN
- 0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042494930
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01gm022209-13)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 22209)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR 81)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
- Keywords
- gentamicin, pharmacokinetics, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, neonates, aminoglycosides, volume of distribution, drug clearance, elimination half-life, sepsis, respiratory failure, dose adjustment
- MeSH terms
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Gentamicins, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Listeriosis, Listeria monocytogenes, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Pneumonia, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review