Cited by 80Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyPharmaceutical studies and practicesMechanical Circulatory Support Devices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates undergoing extracorporal membrane oxygenation

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in 18 infants who underwent ECMO therapy for severe respiratory failure and received gentamicin for possible sepsis. Twelve of these infants continued to receive gentamicin after ECMO had been discontinued. The volume of distribution (Vd) of gentamicin in the newborns receiving ECMO was 0.58 +/- 0.04 liter/kg, compared with a Vd of 0.45 +/- 0.02 liter/kg after ECMO had been discontinued (P = 0.02). The clearance of gentamicin in the patients undergoing ECMO was 42 +/- 3 ml/kg/hour compared with 57 +/- 4 ml/kg/hour in those patients off ECMO (P = 0.003). The elimination half-life in patients receiving ECMO was 10.0 +/- 0.7 hours compared with 5.7 +/- 0.4 hours after ECMO had been discontinued (P less than 0.0001). Neonates undergoing ECMO demonstrate a higher volume of distribution of gentamicin, a lower clearance, and consequently a longer half life for this drug. We conclude that gentamicin and probably other aminoglycosides should be given at dose rates about 25% lower than usual and at longer dosing intervals in patients undergoing ECMO therapy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006454-199008000-00007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 80

Metadata

Authors
COHEN, P., COLLART, L., PROBER, C. G., FISCHER, A. F., & BLASCHKE, T. F.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Published
1990-08
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
562-565
ISSN
0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042494930
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01gm022209-13)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 22209)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 81)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Keywords
gentamicin, pharmacokinetics, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, neonates, aminoglycosides, volume of distribution, drug clearance, elimination half-life, sepsis, respiratory failure, dose adjustment
MeSH terms
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Gentamicins, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Listeriosis, Listeria monocytogenes, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Pneumonia, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review