Cited by 118Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesLeech Biology and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Microsurgical Reattachment of Totally Amputated Ears

Mutimer, Keith L., Banis, Joseph C., Upton, Joseph, Upton, Joseph·1987·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

At a time when microsurgical reattachment of amputated limbs is commonplace, successful reattachment of total ear amputations is rare. Avulsed vessels, small diameters (0.3 to 0.7 mm), and technical difficulties provide primary obstacles. Three clinical cases of ear reattachments are presented which encompass the clinical spectrum of an uncomplicated success, a salvage of an impending failure, and a late failure due to venous thrombosis. In all cases there was difficulty with identification of vessels, with differentiation of arteries from veins, and in the performance of venous anastomoses. Vein grafts were necessary in two of the three patients. Anticoagulation was essential in alleviating venous thrombosis. Medicinal leeches (Hirudo medicinalis) were used to salvage one case with venous thrombosis. Despite the technical difficulties and long operative times, successful microvascular reattachment of an amputated ear is superior to any other means of reattachment or reconstruction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006534-198704000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Venous congestion is the major complication associated with microvascular repair of the auricle.

    “Venous congestion is the major complication associated with microvascular repair of the auricle”
  • Several authors have reported cases where venous congestion led to late failure of reattachment and complete loss of the replanted segment.

    “several authors have reported cases where venous congestion led to late failure of reattachment and complete loss of the replanted segment.58, 59, 60, 61, 62”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mutimer, K. L., Banis, J. C., Upton, J., & Upton, J.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
1987-04
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
535-540
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334159638
Cited by
118
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Leech Biology and Applications
Keywords
venous thrombosis, venous anastomosis, vein grafts, anticoagulation, Hirudo medicinalis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Amputation, Traumatic, Child, Preschool, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Leeches, Male, Microsurgery, Postoperative Complications, Thrombophlebitis, Vascular Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review