Cited by 40Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Microvascular ear replantation

Kind, Gabriel M·2002·Clinics in Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Microvascular ear replantation is a rare event, having been reported only 25 times since the first case in 1980. It requires a lengthy operative time and hospital stay, results in multiple blood transfusions, and has a significant failure rate. Nevertheless, a successful ear replantation is a dramatic demonstration of the power of microsurgery to restore a lost part. When successful, it obviates the need for other complex reconstructive efforts and provides an unsurpassed aesthetic result. This article reviews the history of microsurgical and nonmicrosurgical ear replantation and presents recommendations for treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0094-1298(01)00009-8

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Kind et al's review of 25 microsurgically repaired ears, the average operative time was approximately 6 hours.

    “Kind et al reviewed 25 cases of microsurgically repaired ears and noted an average operative time of approximately 6 hours, an average hospital stay of 11.4 days, and a high likelihood of blood transfusion.57”
  • In Kind et al's review, the average hospital stay was 11.4 days.

    “Kind et al reviewed 25 cases of microsurgically repaired ears and noted an average operative time of approximately 6 hours, an average hospital stay of 11.4 days, and a high likelihood of blood transfusion.57”
  • The average number of transfusions reported by Kind et al was 5.94 units.

    “The average number of transfusions reported by Kind et al was 5.94 units”
  • In Kind et al's review, there was a high likelihood of blood transfusion.

    “Kind et al reviewed 25 cases of microsurgically repaired ears and noted an average operative time of approximately 6 hours, an average hospital stay of 11.4 days, and a high likelihood of blood transfusion.57”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kind, G. M.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Kind, Gabriel M
Venue
Clinics in Plastic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
233-248
ISSN
0094-1298 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056890821
Cited by
40
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinics in Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
microvascular replantation, ear replantation, microvascular anastomosis, composite graft, external ear reconstruction, donor site morbidity
MeSH terms
Adult, Ear, External, Humans, Male, Microsurgery, Postoperative Care, Replantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review