Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Clinical Comparison of the Tendency to Capsular Contracture Between Smooth and Textured Gel-Filled Silicone Mammary Implants

Hakelius, Lars, Ohlsén, Lennart·1992·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

The aim of this prospective, controlled clinical investigation was to find out if there is a difference in the capsular contracture rate between silicone implants with a smooth or textured surface as the only difference. Twenty-five women with bilateral mammary hypoplasia underwent mammary augmentation. All got a textured implant on one side and a smooth implant on the other. The implants were placed subglandularly. Follow-up examinations were done on six occasions. Three parameters were used for estimation of the tendency to capsular contracture: (1) the patient's opinion on differences in hardness of the breasts, (2) the investigator's classification of capsular contracture, and (3) applanation tonometry. At the end of the follow-up period, after 1 year, all parameters showed with no doubt that the breasts augmented with textured implants had a lower tendency to develop contracting capsules than the breasts augmented with smooth implants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006534-199208000-00012

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Hakelius, L., & Ohlsén, L.
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
1992-08
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
247-254
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4234866274
Cited by
168
References
0
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Clinical Comparison of the Tendency to Capsular Contracture Between Smooth and Textured Gel-Filled Silicone Mammary Implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006534-199208000-00012
The paper
Hakelius, L., & Ohlsén, L. (1992). A Clinical Comparison of the Tendency to Capsular Contracture Between Smooth and Textured Gel-Filled Silicone Mammary Implants. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199208000-00012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.