The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Randomized Prospective Study of Polyglycolic Acid Conduits for Digital Nerve Reconstruction in Humans
Abstract
This article reports the first randomized prospective multicenter evaluation of a bioabsorbable conduit for nerve repair. The study enrolled 98 subjects with 136 nerve transections in the hand and prospectively randomized the repair to two groups: standard repair, either end-to-end or with a nerve graft, or repair using a polyglycolic acid conduit. Two-point discrimination was measured by a blinded observer at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after repair. There were 56 nerves repaired in the control group and 46 nerves repaired with a conduit available for follow-up. Three patients had a partial conduit extrusion as a result of loss of the initially crushed skin flap. The overall results showed no significant difference between the two groups as a whole. In the control group, excellent results were obtained in 43 percent of repairs, good results in 43 percent, and poor results in 14 percent. In those nerves repaired with a conduit, excellent results were obtained in 44 percent, good results in 30 percent, and poor results in 26 percent (p = 0.46). When the sensory recovery was examined with regard to length of nerve gap, however, nerves with gaps of 4 mm or less had better sensation when repaired with a conduit; the mean moving two-point discrimination was 3.7 +/- 1.4 mm for polyglycolic acid tube repair and 6.1 +/- 3.3 mm for end-to-end repairs (p = 0.03). All injured nerves with deficits of 8 mm or greater were reconstructed with either a nerve graft or a conduit. This subgroup also demonstrated a significant difference in favor of the polyglycolic acid tube. The mean moving two-point discrimination for the conduit was 6.8 +/- 3.8 mm, with excellent results obtained in 7 of 17 nerves, whereas the mean moving two-point discrimination for the graft repair was 12.9 +/- 2.4 mm, with excellent results obtained in none of the eight nerves (p < 0.001 and p = 0.06, respectively). This investigation demonstrates improved sensation when a conduit repair is used for nerve gaps of 4 mm or less, compared with end-to-end repair of digital nerves. Polyglycolic acid conduit repair also produces results superior to those of a nerve graft for larger nerve gaps and eliminates the donor-site morbidity associated with nerve-graft harvesting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinical Nerve Reconstruction with a Bioabsorbable Polyglycolic Acid Tube
Mackinnon, S. E., & Dellon, A. L. (1990) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-199003000-00015 · Cited by 535
Chronic Nerve Compression—an Experimental Model in the Rat
Mackinnon, S. E., Dellon, A. L., Hudson, A. R., & Hunter, D. A. (1984) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000637-198408000-00004 · Cited by 307
An Alternative to the Classical Nerve Graft for the Management of the Short Nerve Gap
Dellon, A. L., & Mackinnon, S. E. (1988) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-198811000-00020 · Cited by 292
Chiu, D. T. W., & Strauch, B. (1990) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-199011000-00015 · Cited by 259
In Vivo Regeneration of Cut Nerves Encased in Silicone Tubes: Growth across a Six-millimeter Gap
LUNDBORG, G., GELBERMAN, R. H., LONGO, F. M., POWELL, H. C., & VARON, S. (1982) · Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/00005072-198207000-00004 · Cited by 243
Degradable implant materials: A review of synthetic absorbable polymers and their applications
Barrows, T. (1986) · Clinical Materials · doi:10.1016/s0267-6605(86)80015-4 · Cited by 215
Polyglycolic Acid Sutures: Laboratory and Clinical Evaluation of a New Absorbable Suture Material
Herrmann, J. B. (1970) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.1970.01340220162027 · Cited by 202
Selective reinnervation of distal motor stumps by peripheral motor axons
Brushart, T. M. E., & Seiler, W. A. (1987) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/0014-4886(87)90090-2 · Cited by 198
Anatomy of the sural nerve complex
Ortigiiela, M. E., Wood, M. B., & Cahill, D. R. (1987) · The Journal of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(87)80129-6 · Cited by 193
Regeneration of peripheral nerve through a polyglactin tube
Molander, H., Olsson, Y., Engkvist, O., Bowald, S., & Eriksson, I. (1982) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.880050110 · Cited by 186
Cited by
Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration
Gu, X., Ding, F., & Williams, D. F. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.064 · Cited by 630
Gu, X., Ding, F., Yang, Y., & Liu, J. (2011) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.11.002 · Cited by 583
Biomaterials for the Development of Peripheral Nerve Guidance Conduits
Nectow, A. R., Marra, K. G., & Kaplan, D. L. (2012) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0240 · Cited by 395
Pfister, B. J., Gordon, T., Loverde, J. R., Kochar, A. S., Mackinnon, S. E., & Cullen, D. K. (2011) · Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v39.i2.20 · Cited by 358
Biocompatibility evaluation of silk fibroin with peripheral nerve tissues and cells in vitro
Yang, Y., Chen, X., Ding, F., Zhang, P., Liu, J., & Gu, X. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.12.004 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, R. A., Breidenbach, W. C., Brown, R. E., Jabaley, M. E., & Mass, D. P.
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1036-1045
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048670135
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Prospective Study of Polyglycolic Acid Conduits for Digital Nerve Reconstruction in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006534-200010000-00013
- The paper
- Weber, R. A., Breidenbach, W. C., Brown, R. E., Jabaley, M. E., & Mass, D. P. (2000). A Randomized Prospective Study of Polyglycolic Acid Conduits for Digital Nerve Reconstruction in Humans. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200010000-00013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.