Cited by 61Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Studies of Syncope: IV. Biologic Interpretation of Vasodepressor Syncope

ENGEL, GEORGE L., ROMANO, JOHN·1947·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, N. Y.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006842-194709000-00002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 61

Metadata

Authors
ENGEL, G. L., & ROMANO, J.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
1947-09
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
288-294
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2401124472
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
syncope, vasodepressor syncope, autonomic nervous system, blood pressure regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Products, Postural Balance, Humans, Syncope, Syncope, Vasovagal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review