Cited by 74Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The psychophysiology of blood-injection-injury phobia: Looking beyond the diphasic response paradigm

Open access
Ritz, Thomas, Meuret, Alicia E., Ayala, Erica S.·2010·International Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

Blood-injection-injury (BII) phobia is an anxiety disorder that may be accompanied by vasovagal fainting during confrontation with the feared stimuli. The underlying pattern of autonomic regulation has been characterized as a diphasic response, with initial increases in heart rate and blood pressure that are typical of a fight-flight response, and subsequent drops in blood pressure and/or heart rate that may precipitate vasovagal fainting. Tensing skeletal muscles of the arms, legs, and trunk (applied tension) has been proposed as a technique to cope with this dysregulation. This review critically examines the empirical basis for the diphasic response and its treatment by applied tension in BII phobia. An alternative perspective on the psychophysiology of BII phobia and vasovagal fainting is offered by focusing on hypocapnia that leads to cerebral blood flow reductions, a perspective supported by research on neurocardiogenic and orthostatically-induced syncope. The evidence may indicate a role for respiration-focused coping techniques in BII phobia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.05.007

Cites

169 of 169 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the case of BII, studies identified a distinct pathophysiological mechanism.

    “However, in the case of phobia relating to blood, injury, and injection (BII), studies identified a distinct pathophysiological mechanism (9, 21–28)”

    From Combined Fainting and Psychogenic Non-epileptic Seizures as Significant Therapy Hurdles in Blood-Injury-Injection Phobia: A Mini-Review and Case Report (2022) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Overall conclusion and outlook says the core regulatory abnormalities underlying BII-related fainting remain uncertain and that the literature produces more questions than answers. Although the paper describes BII’s fainting response as distinctive, it does not say studies have identified a distinct underlying mechanism; it questions that interpretation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Older studies have shown fainting rates of up to 80%, and even reported seizures, asystolia, and death.

    “Older studies have shown fainting rates of up to 80% (42, 43), and even reported seizures, asystolia, and death (26, 32, 39, 44).”

    From Combined Fainting and Psychogenic Non-epileptic Seizures as Significant Therapy Hurdles in Blood-Injury-Injection Phobia: A Mini-Review and Case Report (2022) · cites this paper as [26]

    In “The anatomy of the perfect storm” (page unavailable), the review reports an earlier account in which the response may result in asystole. It does not give a fainting rate of up to 80%, and its comparison to death is metaphorical, not a report of a death. The differential-diagnosis section distinguishes syncope from epileptic seizures rather than reporting seizures as an outcome. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only about 20% of BII patients display the diphasic response.

    “novel research indicates that only about 20% of BII patients display this diphasic response.”

    From Combined Fainting and Psychogenic Non-epileptic Seizures as Significant Therapy Hurdles in Blood-Injury-Injection Phobia: A Mini-Review and Case Report (2022) · cites this paper as [26]

    In “The elusive pattern: is it diphasic, monophasic, or polyphasic?” (page not provided), the paper says diphasic responses appear much rarer than originally thought and may occur only in a subgroup of BII-phobia patients. It does not give an estimate of about 20% for patients displaying the response; searches for “20%,” “20 percent,” and “one fifth” did not find one. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The blood-injection-injury type of specific phobia may be characterized in some patients by a diphasic response, with an initial rise in heart rate followed by vasovagal bradycardia and, in some cases, syncope.

    “The blood-injection-injury type, in contrast to other phobias which result in persistent tachycardia in response to feared cues, may be characterized in some patients by a diphasic response, with an initial rise in heart rate followed by vasovagal bradycardia and, in some cases, syncope 100,101 .”
  • BII phobia is more complex and heterogeneous than initially believed, especially concerning pathophysiological differences between fainters and non-fainters as well as among different fainting types.

    “These findings illustrate, that BII phobia is more complex and heterogeneous than initially believed, especially concerning pathophysiological differences between fainters and non-fainters as well as among different fainting types.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ayala ES, Ritz T, Meuret AE, 2009 A novel biobehavioral approach to treating bloodinjury-injection phobia. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Conference of the ADAA, Santa Ana Pueblo, NM, March 12– 15.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritz, T., Meuret, A. E., & Ayala, E. S.
Affiliations
Southern Methodist University (US)
Corresponding author
Ritz, Thomas
Venue
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
50-67
ISSN
0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057299162
Cited by
74
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL089761)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
blood-injection-injury phobia, autonomic dysfunction, applied tension, hypocapnia, cerebral blood flow, vasovagal syncope, orthostatic syncope, psychophysiology, heart rate, blood pressure
MeSH terms
Humans, Injections, Phobic Disorders, Psychophysiology, Phlebotomy, Syncope, Vasovagal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review