The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EVOLVING GUIDELINES FOR INTRAVITREOUS INJECTIONS
Abstract
Intravitreous (i.v.t.) injection is increasingly being incorporated into the management of ocular diseases. While only fomivirsen sodium (Vitravene) is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration as an i.v.t. injection, the number of approved i.v.t. injections indications is anticipated to grow on the basis of promising results from ongoing clinical studies. Despite the potential benefits that may be derived from intraocular injections of different agents, no guidelines have been published previously for i.v.t. injection. The purpose of this document is to identify specific strategies for the delivery of i.v.t. injection that may reduce risks and improve outcomes. Consensus was sought among a panel of investigators, surgeons experienced with this technique, and industry representatives. Objective evidence was sought for all guidelines, but consensus was accepted where evidence remains incomplete. In the absence of either evidence or consensus, the current manuscript identifies outstanding issues in need of further investigation. It is anticipated that more complete guidelines will evolve over time, potentially altering some of the guidelines included here, based on new applications of i.v.t. injection, additional clinical experience, and results of clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Gragoudas, E. S., Adamis, A. P., Cunningham, E. T., Feinsod, M., & Guyer, D. R. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042760 · Cited by 2,337
Self-citationSPAIDE, R. F., & FISHER, Y. L. (2006) · Retina · doi:10.1097/00006982-200603000-00004 · Cited by 507
Self-citationWu, L., Martínez-Castellanos, M. A., Quiroz-Mercado, H., Arevalo, J. F., Berrocal, M. H., Farah, M. E., Maia, M., Roca, J. A., Rodriguez, F. J., & for the Pan American Collaborative Retina Group (PACORES) (2007) · Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-007-0660-z · Cited by 456
2018 Update on Intravitreal Injections: Euretina Expert Consensus Recommendations
Grzybowski, A., Told, R., Sacu, S., Bandello, F., Moisseiev, E., Loewenstein, A., Schmidt-Erfurth, U., & on behalf of the Euretina Board (2018) · Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1159/000486145 · Cited by 297
INTRAVITREAL INJECTION TECHNIQUE AND MONITORING: Updated Guidelines of an Expert Panel
Avery, R. L., Bakri, S. J., Blumenkranz, M. S., Brucker, A. J., Cunningham, E. T., D'Amico, D. J., Dugel, P. U., Flynn, H. W., Freund, K. B., Haller, J. A., et al. (2014) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0000000000000399 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- AIELLO, L. P., BRUCKER, A. J., CHANG, S., CUNNINGHAM, E. T., D’AMICO, D. J., FLYNN, H. W., GRILLONE, L. R., HUTCHERSON, S., LIEBMANN, J. M., O’BRIEN, T. P., SCOTT, I. U., SPAIDE, R. F., TA, C., & TRESE, M. T.
- Venue
- Retina
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- Supplement
- Pages
- S3-S19
- ISSN
- 0275-004X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976409243
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EVOLVING GUIDELINES FOR INTRAVITREOUS INJECTIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006982-200410001-00002
- The paper
- AIELLO, L. P., BRUCKER, A. J., CHANG, S., CUNNINGHAM, E. T., D’AMICO, D. J., FLYNN, H. W., GRILLONE, L. R., HUTCHERSON, S., LIEBMANN, J. M., O’BRIEN, T. P., SCOTT, I. U., SPAIDE, R. F., TA, C., & TRESE, M. T. (2004). EVOLVING GUIDELINES FOR INTRAVITREOUS INJECTIONS. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-200410001-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.