The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanoreceptors in Intervertebral Discs: Morphology, Distribution, and Neuropeptides
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: The present study investigated the occurrence and morphology of mechanoreceptors in human and bovine intervertebral discs and longitudinal ligaments. OBJECTIVE: To determine the type and frequency of mechanoreceptors present in intervertebral discs and anterior longitudinal ligaments in two patient groups, those with low back pain and those with scoliosis. Bovine coccygeal discs were examined. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Nerves have been described in intervertebral tissues, but there is little information on the endings of these nerves and their receptors, stimulation of which can cause a nerve impulse. METHODS: The presence of mechanoreceptors were investigated by immunolocalization of nerves and neuropeptides. By examining sequential sections, the frequency of receptors was assessed. RESULTS: Immunoreactivity to neural antigens showed mechanoreceptors in the anulus fibrosus and longitudinal ligaments of bovine and human specimens. Their morphology resembled Pacinian corpuscles, Ruffini endings, and, most frequently, Golgi tendon organs. They were found in 50% of discs investigated from patients with low back pain and in 15% of those with scoliosis. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanoreceptors were found in the outer 2-3 lamellae of the human intervertebral disc and anterior longitudinal ligament. Physiologic studies in other tissues indicate that these provide the individual with sensation of posture and movement, and in the case of Golgi tendon organs, of nociception. In addition to providing proprioception, mechanoreceptors are thought to have roles in maintaining muscle tone and reflexes. Their presence in the intervertebral disc and longitudinal ligament can have physiologic and clinical implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intervertebral Disc: Anatomy‐Physiology‐Pathophysiology‐Treatment
Raj, P. P. (2008) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00171.x · Cited by 746
Assessment and manifestation of central sensitisation across different chronic pain conditions
Arendt‐Nielsen, L., Morlion, B., Perrot, S., Dahan, A., Dickenson, A., Kress, H. G., Wells, C., Bouhassira, D., & Drewes, A. M. (2018) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.1140 · Cited by 695
Innervation of "Painful" Lumbar Discs
Coppes, M. H., Marani, E., Thomeer, R. T. W. M., & Groen, G. J. (1997) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199710150-00005 · Cited by 502
Indahl, A., Kaigle, A. M., Reikerås, O., & Holm, S. H. (1997) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199712150-00006 · Cited by 310
Intervertebral disc, sensory nerves and neurotrophins: who is who in discogenic pain?
García‐Cosamalón, J., Del Valle, M. E., Calavia, M. G., García‐Suárez, O., López‐Muñiz, A., Otero, J., & Vega, J. A. (2010) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01227.x · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, S., Eisenstein, S. M., Menage, J., Evans, E. H., & Ashton, I. K.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2645-2651
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023662202
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanoreceptors in Intervertebral Discs: Morphology, Distribution, and Neuropeptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199512150-00005
- The paper
- Roberts, S., Eisenstein, S. M., Menage, J., Evans, E. H., & Ashton, I. K. (1995). Mechanoreceptors in Intervertebral Discs: Morphology, Distribution, and Neuropeptides. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199512150-00005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.