Cited by 696Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Assessment and manifestation of central sensitisation across different chronic pain conditions

Open access
Arendt‐Nielsen, L., Morlion, B., Perrot, S., Dahan, A., Dickenson, A., Kress, H.G., Wells, C., Bouhassira, D. +1 more·2018·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Different neuroplastic processes can occur along the nociceptive pathways and may be important in the transition from acute to chronic pain and for diagnosis and development of optimal management strategies. The neuroplastic processes may result in gain (sensitisation) or loss (desensitisation) of function in relation to the incoming nociceptive signals. Such processes play important roles in chronic pain, and although the clinical manifestations differ across condition processes, they share some common mechanistic features. The fundamental understanding and quantitative assessment of particularly some of the central sensitisation mechanisms can be translated from preclinical studies into the clinic. The clinical perspectives are implementation of such novel information into diagnostics, mechanistic phenotyping, prevention, personalised treatment, and drug development. The aims of this paper are to introduce and discuss (1) some common fundamental central pain mechanisms, (2) how they may translate into the clinical signs and symptoms across different chronic pain conditions, (3) how to evaluate gain and loss of function using quantitative pain assessment tools, and (4) the implications for optimising prevention and management of pain. The chronic pain conditions selected for the paper are neuropathic pain in general, musculoskeletal pain (chronic low back pain and osteoarthritic pain in particular), and visceral pain (irritable bowel syndrome in particular). The translational mechanisms addressed are local and widespread sensitisation, central summation, and descending pain modulation. Significance: Central sensitisation is an important manifestation involved in many different chronic pain conditions. Central sensitisation can be different to assess and evaluate as the manifestations vary from pain condition to pain condition. Understanding central sensitisation may promote better profiling and diagnosis of pain patients and development of new regimes for mechanism based therapy. Some of the mechanisms underlying central sensitisation can be translated from animals to humans providing new options in development of therapies and profiling drugs under development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejp.1140

Cites

346 of 346 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Arendt-Nielsen, L., Graven-Nielsen, T., Petrini, L. (2012b). Experimental human model and assessenmt of pain in non-pain conditions. In Pain Comorbidities: Understandning and Treating the Complex Patient. Giamberardino, M.A., Jensen, T.S., eds. (Washington DC: IASP Press) 57-83.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arendt‐Nielsen, L., Morlion, B., Perrot, S., Dahan, A., Dickenson, A., Kress, H. G., Wells, C., Bouhassira, D., & Drewes, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Vienna General Hospital (AT)
  • Pain Matters Ltd Liverpool UK
  • Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Arendt‐Nielsen, L.
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-05
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
216-241
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2766251233
Cited by
695
References
345
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
central sensitization, chronic pain, neuroplasticity, neuropathic pain, musculoskeletal pain, chronic low back pain, osteoarthritis, visceral pain, irritable bowel syndrome, descending pain modulation, quantitative pain assessment, pain mechanisms, pain phenotyping, pain prevention
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Neuralgia, Pain Measurement, Low Back Pain, Central Nervous System Sensitization, Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review