Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 502

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Innervation of "Painful" Lumbar Discs

Coppes, Maarten H., Marani, Enrico, Thomeer, Raph T. W. M., Groen, Gerbrand J.·1997·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: The authors investigated the innervation of discographically confirmed degenerated and "painful" human intervertebral discs. OBJECTIVE: To determine the type and distribution patterns of nerve fibers present in degenerated human intervertebral discs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The innervation of intervertebral discs has previously been extensively described in fetal and adult animals as well as humans. However, little is yet known about the innervation of severely degenerated human lumbar discs. The question may be posed whether a disc that has been removed for low back pain possesses an increased innervation compared with normal discs. METHODS: The presence of nerve fibers was investigated using acetylcholinesterase enzyme histochemistry, as well as neurofilament and substance P immunocytochemistry. From 10 degenerated and 2 control discs, the anterior segments were excised and their nerve distribution studied by examining sequential sections. RESULTS: In all specimens, nerve fibers of different diameters were found in the anterior longitudinal ligament and in the outer region of the disc. In 8 of 10 degenerated discs, fibers were also found in the inner parts of the disc. Substance P-immunoreactive nerve fibers were sporadically observed in the anterior longitudinal ligament and the outer zone of the anulus fibrosus. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate a more extensive disc innervation in the severely degenerated human lumbar disc compared with normal discs. The nociceptive properties of at least some of these nerves are highly suggested by their substance P immunoreactivity, which provides further evidence for the existence of a morphologic substrate of discogenic pain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007632-199710150-00005

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 502

Metadata

Authors
Coppes, M. H., Marani, E., Thomeer, R. T. W. M., & Groen, G. J.
Venue
Spine
Published
1997-10
Volume
22
Issue
20
Pages
2342-2349
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986261373
Cited by
502
References
15
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innervation of "Painful" Lumbar Discs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199710150-00005
The paper
Coppes, M. H., Marani, E., Thomeer, R. T. W. M., & Groen, G. J. (1997). Innervation of "Painful" Lumbar Discs. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199710150-00005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.