The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiology of Spinal Osteoporosis
Abstract
Approximately 30% of postmenopausal white women in the United States have osteoporosis, and 16% have osteoporosis of the lumbar spine in particular. Bone density of the spine is positively associated with greater height and weight, older age at menopause, a history of arthritis, more physical activity, moderate use of alcoholic beverages, diuretic treatment, and current estrogen replacement therapy, whereas later age at menarche and a maternal history of fracture are associated with lower levels of density. Low bone density leads to an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Fracture risk also increase with age. Vertebral fractures affect approximately 25% of postmenopausal women, although the exact figure depends on the definition used. Recent data show that vertebral fracture rates are as great in men as in women but, because women live longer, the lifetime risk of a vertebral fracture from age 50 onward is 16% in white women and only 5% in white men. Fracture rates are less in most nonwhite populations, but vertebral fractures are as common in Asian women as in those of European heritage. Other risk factors for vertebral fractures are less clear but include hypogonadism and secondary osteoporosis; obesity is protective of fractures as it is of bone loss. Compared with hip fractures, vertebral fractures are less disabling and less expensive, costing approximately $746 million in the United States in 1995. However, they have a substantial negative impact on the patient's function and quality of life. The adverse effects of osteoporotic fractures are likely to increase in the future with the growing number of elderly people.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in White Women
Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W. S., Stone, K., Fox, K. M., Ensrud, K. E., Cauley, J., Black, D., & Vogt, T. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503233321202 · Cited by 3,595
Pre-Existing Fractures and Bone Mass Predict Vertebral Fracture Incidence in Women
Ross, P. D., Davis, J. W., Epstein, R. S., & Wasnich, R. D. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-11-919 · Cited by 1,107
A Model of Lifetime Osteoporosis Impact
Chrischilles, E. A. (1991) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1991.00400100100017 · Cited by 467
Cited by
Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures
Cummings, S. R., & Melton, L. J. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08657-9 · Cited by 3,821
Simpson, E. R., Clyne, C., Rubin, G., Boon, W. C., Robertson, K., Britt, K., Speed, C., & Jones, M. (2002) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.081601.142703 · Cited by 773
DeWald, C. J., & Stanley, T. (2006) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000236893.65878.39 · Cited by 406
Zoarski, G. H., Snow, P., Olan, W. J., Stallmeyer, M. J. B., Dick, B. W., Hebel, J. R., & De Deyne, M. (2002) · Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61930-7 · Cited by 329
The Incidence of Vertebral Fractures in Men and Women: The Rotterdam Study
Van Der Klift, M., De Laet, C. E. D. H., Mccloskey, E. V., Hofman, A., & Pols, H. A. P. (2002) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.6.1051 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Melton, J. L.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- Supplement
- Pages
- 2S-11S
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2329927106
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of Spinal Osteoporosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199712151-00002
- The paper
- Melton, J. L. (1997). Epidemiology of Spinal Osteoporosis. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199712151-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.