Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Population-Based Study of Spinal Pain Among 35-45-Year-Old Individuals: Prevalence, Sick Leave, and Health Care Use

Linton, Steven J., Hellsing, Anna-Lisa, Halldén, Karin·1998·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire was mailed to 3000 randomly selected 35-45-year-old individuals in three communities in central Sweden. OBJECTIVES: To study the 1-year prevalence of spinal pain and its ramifications in the form of pain, function, sick leave, and health care use. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous researchers have used a variety of definitions and populations, but primarily have investigated the occurrence of pain. Comprehensive data are needed concerning health care use, the degree of the pain problem, functional disturbances, and sick leave. METHOD: Participants in the study completed a questionnaire regarding spinal pain during the past year including the degree of their experienced pain, functional impairment, lost work days, and health care use. RESULTS: A total of 2305 people (78.5%) responded to the questionnaire. Nonrespondents had similar characteristics but a slightly lower 1-year prevalence rate than did respondents. For respondents, the prevalence of spinal pain during the past year was 66.3%, with women having a slightly higher prevalence than men. Approximately 25% of the respondents indicated that they had a substantial problem based on ratings of pain, functional impairment, and sick leave. Work absenteeism reported to the Public Social Insurance Office involved 19% of those with pain, but an additional 15% indicated unreported absenteeism. On average, those with pain visited health care providers three times during the past year, but a small number of those who experienced pain consumed large amounts of health care and illness benefits. An important gender difference was shown, such that when pain was at its worst, men took sick leave, whereas women sought health care. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these data indicate that spinal pain is common among 35-45-year-old men and-women, and that it is related to marked problems for approximately one fourth of those who experience pain. Gender differences exist in the pattern of sick leave and health care use, and a small proportion of those with pain consume very large amounts of the resources. Consequently, there is a need for early, effective, preventive treatments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007632-199807010-00006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Linton, S. J., Hellsing, A.-L., & Halldén, K.
Venue
Spine
Published
1998-07
Volume
23
Issue
13
Pages
1457-1463
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092670339
Cited by
291
References
1
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Population-Based Study of Spinal Pain Among 35-45-Year-Old Individuals: Prevalence, Sick Leave, and Health Care Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199807010-00006
The paper
Linton, S. J., Hellsing, A.-L., & Halldén, K. (1998). A Population-Based Study of Spinal Pain Among 35-45-Year-Old Individuals: Prevalence, Sick Leave, and Health Care Use. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199807010-00006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.