Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CD40-gp39 INTERACTIONS PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE DURING ALLOGRAFT REJECTION: Suppression of Allograft Rejection by Blockade of the CD40-gp39 Pathway1

Larsen, Christian P., Alexander, Diane Z., Hollenbaugh, Diane, Elwood, Eric T., Ritchie, Shannon C., Aruffo, Alejandro, Hendrix, Rose, Pearson, Thomas C.·1996·Transplantation

Abstract

Studies in vivo have documented the importance of CD40-gp39 interactions in the development of T-dependent antibody responses to foreign and auto-antigens. In this report, we demonstrate that allograft rejection is also associated with strong induction of CD40 and gp39 transcripts. When treatment was initiated at the time of transplant, MR1, a mAb specific for gp39, induced markedly prolonged survival of fully disparate murine cardiac allografts in both naive and sensitized hosts. However, when therapy was delayed until postoperative day 5, anti-gp39 failed to prolong graft survival. Allografts from recipients treated with MR1 from the time of transplantation showed decreased expression of transcripts for the macrophage effector molecule, inducible nitric oxide synthase, but essentially unaltered expression of B7 molecules and T cell cytokine transcripts (interleukin [IL]-2, interferon-gamma, IL-10, and IL-4) relative to control allografts. In addition, alloantibody responses in the MR1-treated mice were profoundly inhibited. However, our studies using B cell-deficient mice indicated that the ability of MR1 to prolong allograft survival was not dependent on B cells. These data suggest that blockade of CD40-gp39 interactions may inhibit allograft rejection primarily by interfering with T cell help for effector functions, rather than by interference with T cell activation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007890-199601150-00002

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Larsen, C. P., Alexander, D. Z., Hollenbaugh, D., Elwood, E. T., Ritchie, S. C., Aruffo, A., Hendrix, R., & Pearson, T. C.
Venue
Transplantation
Published
1996-01
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
4-9
ISSN
0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068225706
Cited by
323
References
29
FWCI
32.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CD40-gp39 INTERACTIONS PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE DURING ALLOGRAFT REJECTION: Suppression of Allograft Rejection by Blockade of the CD40-gp39 Pathway1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007890-199601150-00002
The paper
Larsen, C. P., Alexander, D. Z., Hollenbaugh, D., Elwood, E. T., Ritchie, S. C., Aruffo, A., Hendrix, R., & Pearson, T. C. (1996). CD40-gp39 INTERACTIONS PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE DURING ALLOGRAFT REJECTION: Suppression of Allograft Rejection by Blockade of the CD40-gp39 Pathway1. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199601150-00002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.