Cited by 71Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingCardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do Positive Health Expectations and Optimism Relate to Quality-of-Life Outcomes for the Patient With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator?

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical trials with the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) have demonstrated desirable outcomes in terms of mortality and morbidity among patients with potentially lethal arrhythmias. This study examined the "resilience factors" of positive health expectations and global optimism prospectively using the general quality-of-life (QOL) scores of newly implanted ICD patients. METHODS: The study enrolled 88 newly implanted ICD patients (mean age, 65.3 +/- 13.2 years; 83% male; 92% white) assessed 8 and 14 months after ICD implantation. A series of 2 x 2 factorial multivariate analyses of covariance were performed to examine the differences between baseline low versus high positive health expectations and baseline low versus high optimism in short- and long-term general QOL scores. RESULTS: After control was used for ejection fraction (mean, 31%), the patients with baseline high positive health expectations reported better general health at a long-term follow-up assessment (P = .002). The patients with high optimism reported better mental health and social functioning at a short-term follow-up assessment (P =. 056), and this finding approached significance at a long-term follow-up assessment (P = .061). CONCLUSIONS: Positive health expectations and optimism are differentially related to various components of QOL. Collectively, these two resilience factors may be targeted in future studies of interventions to improve QOL for ICD patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00008483-200409000-00008

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who start with high expectations and with optimism have better quality of life.

    “Not surprisingly, individuals who start with high expectations and with optimism have better QOL. 13”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Salovey, 2000, Am Psychol, 55, 110, 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.110 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sears, S. F., Serber, E. R., Lewis, T. S., Walker, R. L., Conners, N., Lee, J. T., Curtis, A. B., & Conti, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Sears, Samuel F.
Venue
Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation
Published
2004-09
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
324-331
ISSN
0883-9212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008044856
Cited by
71
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, optimism, quality of life, resilience factors, mental health, social functioning
MeSH terms
Aged, Attitude to Health, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Stroke Volume, Ventricular Fibrillation, Comorbidity, Treatment Outcome, Defibrillators, Implantable, Sickness Impact Profile, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review