The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The polymorphism A118G of the human mu-opioid receptor gene decreases the pupil constrictory effect of morphine-6-glucuronide but not that of morphine
Abstract
Large individual differences in the clinical response to morphine therapy have been known for a long time by clinicians. The recent advances in genomic research encourage the search for pharmacogenetic causes of that variability. As a measure of central opioid effects, pupil diameters were assessed every 20 min for 18 h after administration of morphine or its active metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) in a two-way crossover study. The opioid effects were compared between six subjects with a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A118G in the mu-opioid receptor gene (five heterozygous, one homozygous) and six control subjects. Non-parametric pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling was employed to identify the influence of the A118G SNP on the concentration-response relationship of M6G and morphine, which was described by a sigmoid Emax model. As a measure of potency, the EC50 of the pupil constrictory effects of M6G was 714 +/- 197 nmol/l in wild-type and 1475 +/- 424 nmol/l in heterozygous carriers of the A118G SNP. In the homozygous carrier of the SNP, it had an EC50 of 3140 nmol/l. In addition, the dose-response relationship was flatter in the A118G carriers than in control subjects (shape factor of the sigmoid Emax model: gamma = 3.3 +/- 1.2, 1.7 +/- 0.5 and 1.6 for wild-type, heterozygous and the homozygous A118G carriers, respectively). In contrast, the concentration-response relationship of morphine was not affected by this specific SNP. The A118G SNP in the mu-receptor gene significantly reduces the potency of M6G in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matthes, H. W. D., Maldonado, R., Simonin, F., Valverde, O., Slowe, S., Kitchen, I., Befort, K., Dierich, A., Le Meur, M., Dollé, P., et al. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/383819a0 · Cited by 1,722
Cited by
Pharmacogenetics and Human Molecular Genetics of Opiate and Cocaine Addictions and Their Treatments
Kreek, M. J., Bart, G., Lilly, C., Laforge, K. S., & Nielsen, D. A. (2005) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.57.1.1 · Cited by 391
Klepstad, P., Rakvåg, T. T., Kaasa, S., Holthe, M., Dale, O., Borchgrevink, P. C., Baar, C., Vikan, T., Krokan, H. E., & Skorpen, F. (2004) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00517.x · Cited by 381
Sia, A. T., Lim, Y., Lim, E. C. P., Goh, R. W. C., Law, H. Y., Landau, R., Teo, Y.-Y., & Tan, E. C. (2008) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e318182af21 · Cited by 297
Chou, W. ‐., Yang, L. ‐., Lu, H. ‐., Ko, J. ‐., Wang, C. ‐., Lin, S. ‐., Lee, T. ‐., Concejero, A., & Hsu, C. ‐. (2006) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01058.x · Cited by 296
Bruehl, S., Burns, J. W., Chung, O. Y., & Chont, M. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.12.003 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Lötsch, J., Skarke, C., Grösch, S., Darimont, J., Schmidt, H., & Geisslinger, G.
- Venue
- Pharmacogenetics
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-9
- ISSN
- 0960-314X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W192884275
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The polymorphism A118G of the human mu-opioid receptor gene decreases the pupil constrictory effect of morphine-6-glucuronide but not that of morphine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00008571-200201000-00002
- The paper
- Lötsch, J., Skarke, C., Grösch, S., Darimont, J., Schmidt, H., & Geisslinger, G. (2002). The polymorphism A118G of the human mu-opioid receptor gene decreases the pupil constrictory effect of morphine-6-glucuronide but not that of morphine. Pharmacogenetics. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008571-200201000-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.