The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CHARACTERISTICS OF AIRBORNE PARTICLES PRODUCED BY WIND EROSION OF SANDY SOIL, HIGH PLAINS OF WEST TEXAS
Abstract
Mass size distributions of airborne particles generated by wind erosion of two soils, one coarse-grained and one fine-grained, show two distinct modes in each. The coarser mode, between 10 and 100 μm equivalent radius, is due to the presence in the parent soil of loose erodible particles which x-ray analyses indicate are almost exclusively quartz grains. The finer mode is between 1 and 10 μm equivalent radius which x-ray analyses show to be clay minerals consisting predominantly of illite and mixed layer clays. The proportion of fine particles to large ones increases relative to wind speed for the finer soil but not for the coarse soil; hence, we ascribed the fineparticle mode as due to sandblasting of the soil, which gives rise to fine particles by disaggregation. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs of airborne fine and large particles give supporting evidence in that the fine particles are similar to clay platelets which adhere to the surfaces of the larger particles and which almost certainly are removed from the grains by the wind erosion sandblasting mechanism. In addition, when coupled with wind velocity data, the SEM photographs indicate that with increased wind speed a higher percentage of the large particles eroded from both soils consists of aggregates of clay. These aggregates are very fragile and they should be readily disaggregated by sandblasting. It is concluded, therefore, that the fine airborne particles (1–10 μm equivalent radius) consist predominantly of clay minerals which are derived from the exposed soils by sandblasting during wind erosion. The clay is removed from the soil as individual platelets, as coatings of platelets on quartz grains, and as coarse aggregates of platelets. Continued sandblasting during wind transport removes the clay platelets from the exposed surfaces of quartz grains and separates the aggregates. As should be expected, the finer-grained soil contains the highest percentage of clay and, upon erosion, yields the highest percentage of fine airborne particles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The physics of wind-blown sand and dust
Kok, J. F., Parteli, E. J. R., Michaels, T. I., & Karam, D. B. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106901 · Cited by 1,608
Modeling dust emission caused by wind erosion
Gillette, D. A., & Passi, R. (1988) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jd093id11p14233 · Cited by 441
Self-citationAutofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols – fluorescent biomolecules and potential interferences
Pöhlker, C., Huffman, J. A., & Pöschl, U. (2012) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-5-37-2012 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- GILLETTE, D. A., & WALKER, T. R.
- Venue
- Soil Science
- Published
- 1977-02
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-110
- ISSN
- 0038-075X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019765564
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CHARACTERISTICS OF AIRBORNE PARTICLES PRODUCED BY WIND EROSION OF SANDY SOIL, HIGH PLAINS OF WEST TEXAS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00010694-197702000-00004
- The paper
- GILLETTE, D. A., & WALKER, T. R. (1977). CHARACTERISTICS OF AIRBORNE PARTICLES PRODUCED BY WIND EROSION OF SANDY SOIL, HIGH PLAINS OF WEST TEXAS. Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197702000-00004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.