Cited by 326Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNuclear Receptors and Signaling

The role of glial cells in Parkinsonʼs disease

Vila, Miquel, Jackson-Lewis, Vernice, Guégan, Christelle, Chu Wu, Du, Teismann, Peter, Choi, Dong-Kug, Tieu, Kim, Przedborski, Serge·2001·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

Parkinson's disease is a common neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the progressive loss of the dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. The loss of these neurons is associated with a glial response composed mainly of activated microglial cells and, to a lesser extent, of reactive astrocytes. This glial response may be the source of trophic factors and can protect against reactive oxygen species and glutamate. Aside from these beneficial effects, the glial response can mediate a variety of deleterious events related to the production of reactive species, and pro-inflammatory prostaglandin and cytokines. This article reviews the potential protective and deleterious effects of glial cells in the substantia nigra pars compacta of Parkinson's disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00019052-200108000-00009

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GLP-1 therapy may be beneficial for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, atherosclerosis, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetic nephropathy, asthma, and psoriasis.

    “Thus, GLP-1 therapy may be beneficial for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, atherosclerosis, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetic nephropathy, asthma, and psoriasis [14, 26–32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vila, M., Jackson-Lewis, V., Guégan, C., Chu Wu, D., Teismann, P., Choi, D.-K., Tieu, K., & Przedborski, S.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Przedborski, Serge
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2001-08
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
483-489
ISSN
1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078056296
Cited by
326
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29ns037345-05)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50-NS38370, R01 NS 38586, R29 NS37345, R01NS038586, P50NS038370)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, glial cells, microglial activation, reactive astrocytes, substantia nigra pars compacta, dopaminergic neuron loss, neuroinflammation, reactive oxygen species, glutamate excitotoxicity, prostaglandins, cytokines, neuroprotection
MeSH terms
Astrocytes, Dopamine, Humans, Neurons, Parkinson Disease, Substantia Nigra, Cytokines, Microglia, Chemokines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review