Cited by 43Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gene variants, insulin resistance, and dyslipidaemia

Laakso, Markku·2004·Current Opinion in Lipidology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Both insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia are determined by genetic and environmental factors. Depending on their expression and their function, gene variants (mutations, polymorphisms) can primarily regulate either insulin action or dyslipidaemia. The purpose of this review is to give some examples from recent studies on gene variants regulating primarily insulin signalling or lipoprotein metabolism. RECENT FINDINGS: Common polymorphisms in the PC-1, insulin receptor substrate 1 and 2, and PPAR-gamma 2 genes have been linked to insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia, although the results have not been consistent. However, the Pro12Pro genotype of the PPAR-gamma 2 gene has been consistently associated with insulin resistance and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Promoter polymorphisms in the hepatic lipase gene, the 54Thr allele of the fatty acid binding protein 2 gene, and genes regulating LDL particle size have been associated with lipid metabolism, but on the other hand their association with insulin resistance is not consistent. SUMMARY: Although results have not always been consistent, gene variants affecting primary insulin action or dyslipidaemia, and particularly their interaction with the environment, are important modulators of glucose and lipoprotein metabolism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00041433-200404000-00004

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Camejo, 2003, ), 134, 36

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Laakso, M.
Affiliations
University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Laakso, Markku
Venue
Current Opinion in Lipidology
Published
2004-04
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
115-120
ISSN
0957-9672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028058870
Cited by
43
References
36
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Lipidology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
genetic variants, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, insulin signaling, lipoprotein metabolism, PPARγ2, Pro12Ala polymorphism, hepatic lipase, fatty acid binding protein 2, LDL particle size, insulin receptor substrate, genetic polymorphism, gene-environment interaction
MeSH terms
Alleles, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Insulin Resistance, Phosphoric Diester Hydrolases, Pyrophosphatases, Risk Factors, Genetic Variation, PPAR gamma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review