The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care: an international study of different treatment strategies with omeprazole
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of omeprazole in patients presenting with troublesome reflux symptoms. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled comparison. SETTING: Primary care. SUBJECTS: Patients were recruited using a symptom-based questionnaire for diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. INTERVENTIONS: After endoscopy, patients without endoscopic oesophagitis were randomized to omeprazole 20 mg (Ome20), omeprazole 10 mg (Ome10) or placebo once daily for 4 weeks (n = 261) and those with oesophagitis (except circumferential/ulcerative) were randomized to receive either Ome20 or Ome10 once daily for 4 weeks (n = 277). Patients not symptom-free at 4 weeks received open treatment with Ome20 once daily for a further 4 weeks. Those symptom-free at 4-8 weeks were followed up for 6 months off treatment, to see whether their symptoms recurred. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Complete upper GI symptom relief during week 4 on Ome20 or Ome10 in patients with or without endoscopic oesophagitis. RESULTS: Forty one percent of all patients on Ome20 and 35% on Ome10 reported complete relief from upper GI symptoms during week 4, whilst 73% of the patients on Ome20 and 62% on Ome10 obtained sufficient control. Complete relief during week 4 was reported by 19% of endoscopy-negative patients on placebo, and sufficient control by 35%. Endoscopic healing at 4 weeks occurred in 76% of oesophagitis patients on Ome20 and in 56% on Ome10. After 6 months off treatment, 90% of patients with oesophagitis and 75% of endoscopy-negative patients reported symptomatic relapse. CONCLUSION: Both 10 mg and 20 mg of omeprazole gave effective relief of symptoms, although 20 mg gave superior healing in patients with oesophagitis. After cessation of treatment, symptomatic relapse was rapid and frequent in both endoscopy-positive and endoscopy-negative patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus
Gyawali, C. P., Kahrilas, P. J., Savarino, E., Zerbib, F., Mion, F., Smout, A. J. P. M., Vaezi, M., Sifrim, D., Fox, M. R., Vela, M. F., et al. (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722 · Cited by 1,457
Sigterman, K. E., van Pinxteren, B., Bonis, P. A., Lau, J., & Numans, M. E. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002095.pub5 · Cited by 507
for the SIF-AIGO-FIMMG Group, Scarpignato, C., on behalf of the Italian Society of Pharmacology, T. I. A. O. H. G., Gatta, L., Zullo, A., & Blandizzi, C. (2016) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0718-z · Cited by 469
Diagnosis and management of patients with reflux symptoms refractory to proton pump inhibitors
Sifrim, D., & Zerbib, F. (2012) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301897 · Cited by 346
NOJKOV, B., RUBENSTEIN, J. H., ADLIS, S. A., SHAW, M. J., SAAD, R., RAI, J., WEINMAN, B., & CHEY, W. D. (2008) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03596.x · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlsson, R., Dent, J., Watts, R., Riley, S., Sheikh, R., Hatlebakk, J., Haug, K., de Groot, G., van Oudvorst, A., Dalväg, A., Junghard, O., & Wiklund, I.
- Venue
- European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-124
- ISSN
- 0954-691X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019203561
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care: an international study of different treatment strategies with omeprazole. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00042737-199802000-00004
- The paper
- Carlsson, R., Dent, J., Watts, R., Riley, S., Sheikh, R., Hatlebakk, J., Haug, K., de Groot, G., van Oudvorst, A., Dalväg, A., Junghard, O., & Wiklund, I. (1998). Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care: an international study of different treatment strategies with omeprazole. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042737-199802000-00004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.