Cited by 399Muscle Physiology and DisordersUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysMuscle metabolism and nutrition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What do we really know about the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in muscle atrophy?

Jagoe, R. Thomas, Goldberg, Alfred L.·2001·Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care

Abstract

Studies of many different rodent models of muscle wasting have indicated that accelerated proteolysis via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is the principal cause of muscle atrophy induced by fasting, cancer cachexia, metabolic acidosis, denervation, disuse, diabetes, sepsis, burns, hyperthyroidism and excess glucocorticoids. However, our understanding about how muscle proteins are degraded, and how the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is activated in muscle under these conditions, is still very limited. The identities of the important ubiquitin-protein ligases in skeletal muscle, and the ways in which they recognize substrates are still largely unknown. Recent in-vitro studies have suggested that one set of ubquitination enzymes, E2(14K) and E3(alpha), which are responsible for the 'N-end rule' system of ubiquitination, plays an important role in muscle, especially in catabolic states. However, their functional significance in degrading different muscle proteins is still unclear. This review focuses on the many gaps in our understanding of the functioning of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in muscle atrophy, and highlights the strengths and limitations of the different experimental approaches used in such studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00075197-200105000-00003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Rock, 1994, Cell, 78, 761, 10.1016/S0092-8674(94)90462-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Schwartz, 1999, Annu Rev Med, 50, 57, 10.1146/annurev.med.50.1.57 · DOI
  3. Baumeister, 1998, Cell, 92, 367, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80929-0 · DOI
  4. Pickart, 2000, Trends Biochem Sci, 25, 544, 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01681-9 · DOI
  5. Lam, 1997, Nature, 385, 737, 10.1038/385737a0 · DOI
  6. Deshaies, 1999, Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 15, 435, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.435 · DOI
  7. Solomon, 1998, J Biol Chem, 273, 25216, 10.1074/jbc.273.39.25216 · DOI
  8. Bastians, 1999, Mol Biol Cell, 10, 3927, 10.1091/mbc.10.11.3927 · DOI
  9. Chen, 1995, Genes Dev, 9, 1586, 10.1101/gad.9.13.1586 · DOI
  10. Lecker, 1999, J Nutr, 129, 227S, 10.1093/jn/129.1.227S · DOI
  11. Furuno, 1986, Biochem J, 237, 859, 10.1042/bj2370859 · DOI
  12. Lowell, 1986, Biochem J, 234, 237, 10.1042/bj2340237 · DOI
  13. Etlinger, 1977, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 74, 54, 10.1073/pnas.74.1.54 · DOI
  14. Hershko, 1992, Annu Rev Biochem, 61, 761, 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.003553 · DOI
  15. Medina, 1991, Biomed Biochim Acta, 50, 347
  16. Taillandier, 1996, Biochem J, 316, 65, 10.1042/bj3160065 · DOI
  17. Mitch, 1994, J Clin Invest, 93, 2127, 10.1172/JCI117208 · DOI
  18. Wing, 1993, Am J Physiol, 264, E668
  19. Temparis, 1994, Cancer Res, 54, 5568
  20. Llovera, 1995, Int J Cancer, 61, 138, 10.1002/ijc.2910610123 · DOI
  21. Baracos, 1995, Am J Physiol, 268, E996
  22. Lee, 1998, Trends Cell Biol, 8, 397, 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01346-4 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Price, 1996, J Clin Invest, 98, 1703, 10.1172/JCI118968 · DOI
  24. Bailey, 1996, J Clin Invest, 97, 1447, 10.1172/JCI118566 · DOI
  25. Tawa, 1997, J Clin Invest, 100, 197, 10.1172/JCI119513 · DOI
  26. Furuno, 1990, J Biol Chem, 265, 8550, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)38923-9 · DOI
  27. Tiao, 1996, J Clin Invest, 97, 339, 10.1172/JCI118421 · DOI
  28. Medina, 1995, Biochem J, 307, 631, 10.1042/bj3070631 · DOI
  29. Llovera, 1994, FEBS Lett, 338, 311, 10.1016/0014-5793(94)80290-4 · DOI
  30. Voisin, 1996, J Clin Invest, 97, 1610, 10.1172/JCI118586 · DOI
  31. Auclair, 1997, Am J Physiol, 272, C1007, 10.1152/ajpcell.1997.272.3.C1007 · DOI
  32. Mitch, 1999, Am J Physiol, 276, C1132, 10.1152/ajpcell.1999.276.5.C1132 · DOI
  33. Wing, 1995, Biochem J, 307, 639, 10.1042/bj3070639 · DOI
  34. Hobler, 1999, Am J Physiol, 277, R434
  35. Wing, 1994, Am J Physiol, 267, E39, 10.1152/ajpcell.1994.267.1.C39 · DOI
  36. Lecker, 1999, J Clin Invest, 104, 1411, 10.1172/JCI7300 · DOI
  37. Hobler, 1999, Am J Physiol, 276, R468
  38. Chrysis, 1999, Endocrinology, 140, 5635, 10.1210/en.140.12.5635 · DOI
  39. Fischer, 2000, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 267, 504, 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1987 · DOI
  40. Solomon, 1996, J Biol Chem, 271, 26690, 10.1074/jbc.271.41.25240 · DOI
  41. Solomon, 1998, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95, 12602, 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12602 · DOI
  42. Solomon, 2000, J Surg Res, 93, 120, 10.1006/jsre.2000.5958 · DOI
  43. Bachmair, 1986, Science, 234, 179, 10.1126/science.3018930 · DOI
  44. Reiss, 1988, J Biol Chem, 263, 2693, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)69123-9 · DOI
  45. Baker, 1991, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 88, 1090, 10.1073/pnas.88.4.1090 · DOI
  46. Turner, 2000, Nature, 405, 579, 10.1038/35014629 · DOI
  47. Bartel, 1990, EMBO J, 9, 3179, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07516.x · DOI
  48. Kayalar, 1996, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 93, 2234, 10.1073/pnas.93.5.2234 · DOI
  49. Williams, 1999, FASEB J, 13, 1435, 10.1096/fasebj.13.11.1435 · DOI
  50. Grigoryev, 1996, J Biol Chem, 271, 28521, 10.1074/jbc.271.45.28521 · DOI
  51. Ciechanover, 1988, J Biol Chem, 263, 11155, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)37936-5 · DOI
  52. Gonen, 1996, J Biol Chem, 271, 302, 10.1074/jbc.271.1.302 · DOI
  53. Roest, 1996, Cell, 86, 799, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80154-3 · DOI
  54. Kwon, 1998, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95, 7898, 10.1073/pnas.95.14.7898 · DOI
  55. Williams, 1999, Surgery, 126, 744, 10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70131-5 · DOI
  56. Tiao, 1997, J Clin Invest, 99, 163, 10.1172/JCI119143 · DOI
  57. Mansoor, 1996, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 93, 2714, 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2714 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 399

Metadata

Authors
Jagoe, R. T., & Goldberg, A. L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Goldberg, Alfred L.
Venue
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
Published
2001-05
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
183-190
ISSN
1363-1950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024946243
Cited by
399
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 26
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • ALS Association
  • Muscular Dystrophy Association
  • US-UK Fulbright Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
ubiquitin-proteasome system, muscle atrophy, skeletal muscle protein degradation, ubiquitin-protein ligase, N-end rule, E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, E3 ubiquitin ligase, cachexia, denervation, disuse, glucocorticoids, metabolic acidosis, sepsis, burns, hyperthyroidism, diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Animals, Cysteine Endopeptidases, Humans, Multienzyme Complexes, Muscle Proteins, Muscular Atrophy, RNA, Messenger, Ubiquitins, Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors, Muscle, Skeletal, Wasting Syndrome, Culture Techniques, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review