Cited by 39Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Telemonitoring of blood pressure self measurement in the OLMETEL study

Mengden, Thomas, Ewald, Silke, Kaufmann, Stefanie, vor dem Esche, Johannes, Uen, Sakir, Vetter, Hans·2004·Blood Pressure Monitoring

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring in previous uncontrolled hypertensives treated with olmesartan medoxomil in a clinical practice setting. METHODS: Patients (n = 53) with untreated, uncontrolled or insufficiently treated hypertension were selected by physicians to receive olmesartan medoxomil 10-40 mg/day for 12 weeks. Office BP values were determined by a physician at baseline and after 12 weeks' treatment; BP self-measurement (BPSM) was conducted throughout the 12-week treatment period using a TensioPhone TP2 telemonitoring device; BP values were stored and automatically downloaded to a remote service centre via standard telephone lines. RESULTS: Olmesartan medoxomil produced statistically significant reductions from baseline in both systolic and diastolic office BP and BPSM values. In contrast to office BP, telemonitoring of BPSM allowed the early identification of responders (e.g., after 2-3 weeks' treatment). Blood pressure reduction with olmesartan medoxomil was greater for office BP than for BPSM values. Normalization of BP was achieved in 64.2% of the patients using office BP measurement compared with 36.4% using BPSM. Blood pressure self-measurement showed no significant difference between morning and evening BP measurements or between the morning : evening BP ratio at baseline and after nine weeks of olmesartan medoxomil treatment. Compliance and tolerability were good or very good in most patients. CONCLUSION: In a 'real-life' clinical practice setting, telemonitoring of BPSM was an effective technique that was partially affected by patient non-compliance. Olmesartan medoxomil provided effective and reliable BP-lowering, which was maintained throughout the 24-hour period.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00126097-200412000-00010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Mengden, 2003, Blood Press Monit, 8, 169???172, 10.1097/00126097-200308000-00008 · DOI
  2. M??nard, 1996, Blood Press Monit, 1, S63???S67
  3. Kleinert, 1984, Hypertension, 6, 574???578, 10.1161/01.HYP.6.4.574 · DOI
  4. Mengden, 2001, Blood Press Monit, 6, 185???189, 10.1097/00126097-200108000-00004 · DOI
  5. Friedman, 1996, Am J Hypertens, 9, 285???292
  6. Rogers, 2001, Ann Intern Med, 134, 1024???1032, 10.7326/0003-4819-134-11-200106050-00008 · DOI
  7. Parati, 2004, J Hypertens, 22, S137(abstract), 10.1097/00004872-200406002-00469 · DOI
  8. Warner, 2002, Drugs, 62, 1345???1353
  9. Ball, 2001, J Hypertens, 19, S49???S56
  10. Chrysant, 2003, J Hum Hypertens, 17, 425???432, 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001577 · DOI
  11. Stumpe, 2002, J Hum Hypertens, 16, S24???S28
  12. Oparil, 2001, J Clin Hypertens, 3, 283???291, 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.01136.x · DOI
  13. Brunner, 2003, Clin Drug Invest, 23, 419???430, 10.2165/00044011-200323070-00001 · DOI
  14. Puchler, 2001, J Hypertens, 19, S41???S48
  15. Neutel, 2001, Am J Cardiol, 87, 37C???43C, 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01510-7 · DOI
  16. Chilman-Blair, 2003, Drugs Today, 39, 745???761, 10.1358/dot.2003.39.10.799468 · DOI
  17. Illy??s, 2002, Blood Press Monit, 7, 67???68
  18. 2003, J Hypertens, 21, 1011???1053
  19. Pierdomenico, 1995, Eur Heart J, 16, 692???697, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060975 · DOI
  20. Segre, 2003, Arq Bras Cardiol, 80, 117???126, 10.1590/S0066-782X2003000200001 · DOI
  21. Schwocho, 2001, J Clin Pharmacol, 41, 515???527, 10.1177/00912700122010393 · DOI
  22. Mengden, 1992, Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 42, 569???575, 10.1007/BF00265917 · DOI
  23. Chobanian, 2003, JAMA, 289, 2560???2572, 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Greathouse, 2002, Congest Heart Fail, 8, 313???320, 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2002.02077.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mengden, T., Ewald, S., Kaufmann, S., vor dem Esche, J., Uen, S., & Vetter, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Daiichi Sankyo (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Mengden, Thomas
Venue
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Published
2004-12
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
321-325
ISSN
1359-5237 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042206456
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood Pressure Monitoring (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
blood pressure telemonitoring, blood pressure self-measurement, olmesartan medoxomil, uncontrolled hypertension, office blood pressure, antihypertensive treatment response, medication adherence, real-world clinical practice
MeSH terms
Olmesartan Medoxomil, Adult, Antihypertensive Agents, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Hypertension, Imidazoles, Self Care, Tetrazoles, Telemedicine, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review