Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The validity of the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register and Causes of Death Register data on coronary heart disease

Pajunen, Pia, Koukkunen, Heli, Ketonen, Matti, Jerkkola, Tapani, Immonen-R??ih??, Pirjo, K??rj??-Koskenkari, P??ivi, M??h??nen, Markku, Niemel??, Matti, Kuulasmaa, Kari, Palom??ki, Pertti, Mustonen, Juha, Lehtonen, Aapo, Arstila, Matti, Vuorenmaa, Tapio, Lehto, Seppo, Miettinen, Heikki, Torppa, Jorma, Tuomilehto, Jaakko, Kes??niemi, Y. Antero, Py??r??l??, Kalevi, Salomaa, Veikko·2005·European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND DESIGN: The recent introduction of sensitive markers of myocardial injury is likely to affect the epidemiology of coronary heart disease (CHD). The American Heart Association together with other societies and research agencies have recently published a new definition on acute CHD to improve consistency in epidemiological and clinical studies (referred here as the '2003 definition'). METHODS: In this study we compare the data on CHD events in the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register (HDR) and the Causes of Death Register (CDR) with the population-based myocardial infarction (MI) register, FINMONICA/FINAMI. The FINMONICA/FINAMI events were classified according to the 2003 definition. The relevant International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes from the HDR and CDR were used. RESULTS: Using the 2003 definition as the reference, the overall sensitivity of the ICD codes for MI in the combined HDR and CDR was 83% and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 90%. When the ICD codes for unstable angina were added to the analyses, the sensitivity improved to 85% and the PPV declined to 83%. In the age group 35-74 the sensitivity of the MI codes improved over time, in men from 64% in 1988-1992 to 81% in 1998-2002, and in women from 61 to 78%, respectively. The oldest age group, 75 years or older, had sensitivity and PPV values comparable to those of the younger. CONCLUSION: Diagnoses of fatal and non-fatal CHD events in the Finnish HDR and Causes of Death register were reasonably valid indicators for hard CHD events when compared with the FINMONICA/FINAMI register data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00149831-200504000-00007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Pajunen, P., Koukkunen, H., Ketonen, M., Jerkkola, T., Immonen-R??ih??, P., K??rj??-Koskenkari, P., M??h??nen, M., Niemel??, M., Kuulasmaa, K., Palom??ki, P., Mustonen, J., Lehtonen, A., Arstila, M., Vuorenmaa, T., Lehto, S., Miettinen, H., Torppa, J., Tuomilehto, J., Kes??niemi, Y. A., Py??r??l??, K., & Salomaa, V.
Venue
European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation
Published
2005-04
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
132-137
ISSN
1741-8267 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127841529
Cited by
334
References
0
FWCI
38.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.